A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.

about

A review of interventions to reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology.Group consensus peer review in radiation oncology: commitment to quality.

P2860

Q38832522-A4E65160-7A9E-4DF7-9A5E-551CCB50DBEF Q52627177-D9F38902-C50B-443D-B240-62464C5A8661

P2860

A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38125612

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

A survey of radiation treatmen ...... ractice and future directions.

@en

type

Item

label

A survey of radiation treatmen ...... ractice and future directions.

@en

prefLabel

A survey of radiation treatmen ...... ractice and future directions.

@en

P1476

A survey of radiation treatmen ...... practice and future directions

@en

P2093

Eric Gutierrez

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael Brundage

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael Sharpe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sophie Foxcroft

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tom McGowan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

The impact of contouring uncertainty on rectal 3D dose-volume data: results of a dummy run in a multicenter trial (AIROPROS01-02).

Development of RTOG consensus guidelines for the definition of the clinical target volume for postoperative conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study

Tools for consensus analysis of experts' contours for radiotherapy structure definitions.

Evaluation of an audit with feedback continuing medical education program for radiation oncologists.

Quality assurance in radiation oncology.

Point/Counterpoint. Peer reviews of medical physics practices often yield little information because the AAPM has not been proactive in developing appropriate peer-review guidelines.

Enhancing the role of case-oriented peer review to improve quality and safety in radiation oncology: Executive summary.

RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument.

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJOPEN-2013-003241

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Padraig Warde

P577

2013-07-31T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

254261215

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23903814

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3731715

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.

about

P2860

P2860

A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P932