A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38138160

about

Applying a Weight-of-Evidence Approach to Evaluate Relevance of Molecular Landscapes in the Exposure-Disease Paradigm A critical review of perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctanesulfonate exposure and immunological health conditions in humans Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working group Comprehensive review of epidemiological and animal studies on the potential carcinogenic effects of nicotine per se Improving weight of evidence approaches to chemical evaluations.Rethinking Meta-Analysis: Applications for Air Pollution Data and Beyond.Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.Does GLP enhance the quality of toxicological evidence for regulatory decisions?Key Elements for Judging the Quality of a Risk Assessment.Hypothesis-Based Weight of Evidence: An Approach to Assessing Causation and its Application to Regulatory Toxicology.Weight-of-evidence evaluation of short-term ozone exposure and cardiovascular effects.Weight-of-evidence evaluation of long-term ozone exposure and cardiovascular effects.Chronic low-level hydrogen sulfide exposure and potential effects on human health: a review of the epidemiological evidence.A critical review finds styrene lacks direct endocrine disruptor activity.Evidence-based causation in toxicology: A 10-year retrospective.Hypothesis-driven weight-of-evidence analysis of endocrine disruption potential: a case study with triclosan.A weight of evidence framework for environmental assessments: Inferring qualities.Using systematic review in occupational safety and health Principles and process for dealing with data and evidence in scientific assessments Weighing evidence and assessing uncertainties Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments Weight of evidence analysis for assessing the genotoxic potential of carbon nanotubes.

P2860

Q26784509-B406144C-0B7C-4686-BAC3-C568E5C4DFAD Q28072372-293FACEE-5F02-4EEC-8765-F32B257CC064 Q28076931-21148DC0-08FF-4777-97C9-E80F7F288A5F Q28830476-0751DA9C-369F-4560-862E-F3783E946C3E Q30301106-4FB4751A-4093-4403-8929-2AE3B30BF1E3 Q30950908-FCBC1A8B-3E22-459A-83AC-1837BB3761D1 Q33840915-8640CCF1-54D1-44BD-BEE0-4D345723DA39 Q34554675-01CBC1C0-D024-4215-9DAE-9EEC1AAA59FB Q36935455-F54DCD6E-6FCC-4769-9A1B-D7CF9653059C Q37158828-AD65B7FA-655F-4A52-869E-5D4B63E442CC Q38203917-3BCAD483-5706-43E9-8EC4-A69C19725693 Q38254523-DAB4E596-04DC-41A1-BF55-AA2791A1EAD3 Q38254525-C57014B7-05B3-429D-A918-9C73FC34A64A Q38272120-1DECD0C6-CCAA-4819-A8CC-8DAB96A1A612 Q38592797-341940F6-34D6-4457-82E8-CA5BB1980178 Q38651268-896CBC80-1090-49F9-B63F-88F971A7A3A1 Q38995956-52EA12C2-B3B9-4422-A7B5-B8ADD095089E Q39371955-1FD2C783-E426-4604-8553-FF79CC9270F3 Q41571379-8EF96637-13EC-4055-B58D-C1E812DBE60C Q47157013-19CD0ACB-3A5A-4F65-B9A8-DF57A717B21A Q47157927-717462D2-739B-4B17-9D4C-5C940BCC47C5 Q47160449-DBE1A2A2-0066-4957-AA4E-2B7E7AC6716B Q47186558-6DF8BDA9-ED4B-4EC7-A9FC-F1FDC2F49353

P2860

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38138160

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年学术文章

@wuu

2013年学术文章

@zh-cn

2013年学术文章

@zh-hans

2013年学术文章

@zh-my

2013年学术文章

@zh-sg

2013年學術文章

@yue

2013年學術文章

@zh

2013年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

@en

type

label

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

@en

prefLabel

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

@en

P1433

Q38138160-F7525293-3104-4ADC-8746-947063D8A73C

P1476

Q38138160-C0D8099B-3ABB-42CC-8AE3-CC80CA10235D

P2093

Q38138160-0719DBC2-5C7B-43A5-82CB-C5D862EBB495

Q38138160-26B514AB-99E3-4DF7-9CDC-19B70A0ED548

Q38138160-3661CD35-48D9-4891-AB0F-713606460AB0

Q38138160-4B204B7C-F345-4864-B3D2-B72AEC0107B1

Q38138160-80CC9F1A-1247-4D1E-99E4-110536EDA800

Q38138160-97BEDB8E-5A5A-4147-8844-52F16661B680

Q38138160-B64D0F2C-D923-49F7-95FF-939B2FAB0DBA

Q38138160-C00620BD-EE30-48A3-8FEF-F33BFCAAEB27

Q38138160-D1326979-2056-415F-842D-65CC9504B3B2

Q38138160-D66FA220-93C1-4599-81D1-0C9CB0FBCE32

P2860

Q38138160-038DA36A-8F34-4B0C-9E16-618E6461C4EC

Q38138160-0EDA5092-FE55-4AFD-B6FA-D44E16559F7F

Q38138160-18A6818C-9A2A-42C5-A006-E0D7C3741166

Q38138160-1923C8DD-0913-483C-95E2-7CC9E5F5EA83

Q38138160-1A780DB4-8992-4C5D-97B8-F9EA77EE408F

Q38138160-1DD31260-8797-4879-8D28-4455F88B3547

Q38138160-2BC6FFB3-EE15-49FD-830C-13ECEDDF33C4

Q38138160-3F0A40D2-CC39-4EC2-9E87-FF25E5F0BCA5

Q38138160-40429FE9-96F2-41B6-A849-8E901D8C1AB6

Q38138160-5796E2B2-375F-47B7-89C9-C6F50E231189

P304

Q38138160-56E94D71-E565-472A-8B1C-9705DC9DB439

P31

Q38138160-2CF9157B-B278-4D1A-8E03-4332E625CA3A

P356

Q38138160-50F7BFF9-B096-499B-8308-2B532A4E7083

P407

Q38138160-20DC7701-8C1B-4FD8-9B7B-E238C395A2F9

P433

Q38138160-9F9EB6F8-960A-409F-9774-0573B01231C3

P478

Q38138160-969A8CC0-78C6-460A-9F48-403889D83662

P577

Q38138160-CA470502-FDC5-423D-99A2-1497D146B607

P698

Q38138160-71AFA197-F3A3-4F30-A28C-67A2F890F1DA

P921

Q38138160-8E1CE234-9B81-481D-B1D3-FFCD3201EAB1

P356

10408444.2013.832727

P1433

Critical Reviews in Toxicology

P1476

A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.

@en

P2093

Christopher Bevan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Greg Paoli

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Julie E Goodman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kimberly C Wise

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lisa A Bailey

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lorenz R Rhomberg

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lynn H Pottenger

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael Honeycutt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nancy B Beck

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Norbert E Kaminski

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Overview: Using mode of action and life stage information to evaluate the human relevance of animal toxicity data.

A framework for using epidemiological data for risk assessment.

CEBS--Chemical Effects in Biological Systems: a public data repository integrating study design and toxicity data with microarray and proteomics data.

P304

753-784

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3109/10408444.2013.832727

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

43

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-10-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

24040995

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921