Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
about
Challenging script concordance test reference standard by evidence: do judgments by emergency medicine consultants agree with likelihood ratios?Validation of undergraduate medical student script concordance test (SCT) scores on the clinical assessment of the acute abdomen.Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings.Accuracy of script concordance tests in fourth-year medical students.Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature review.The script concordance test for clinical reasoning: re-examining its utility and potential weakness.Justify Your Answer: The Role of Written Think Aloud in Script Concordance Testing.Virtual patients in the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills: does presentation mode matter? A quasi-randomized controlled trial.Scoring the Script Concordance Test: not a black and white issue.Investing in the use of a checklist during differential diagnoses consideration: what's the trade-off?Assessing clinical reasoning in optometry using the script concordance test.Scoring method of a Situational Judgment Test: influence on internal consistency reliability, adverse impact and correlation with personality?Script concordance test in medical schools in Brazil: possibilities and limitations.A Bayesian perspective on constructing a written assessment of probabilistic clinical reasoning in experienced clinicians.Assessing the application of knowledge in clinical problem-solving: The structured professional reasoning exercise.Improving the validity of script concordance testing by optimising and balancing items.Using the Script Concordance Test to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning Skills in Psychiatry.Promoting student case creation to enhance instruction of clinical reasoning skills: a pilot feasibility study.Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test.Examining the effects of gaming and guessing on script concordance test scores.Criterion scores, construct validity and reliability of a web-based instrument to assess physiotherapists' clinical reasoning focused on behaviour change: 'Reasoning 4 Change'
P2860
Q35011725-42A3E19D-54F1-42A3-BC1A-7B1BC5466586Q36106445-DDB98F9D-63A8-4DCE-9665-D4CD5BF5848DQ36151572-74F2CC86-FE11-4476-A0A4-088F7D362E70Q37682952-17A12B77-48D6-424A-A788-3996362625D7Q38238986-8C1CC55E-4A75-4DE2-A167-6FF34D9A76C8Q38259398-CC877682-67D8-4011-9B41-E7B76D7D6055Q38818326-5C3B3D7B-5E4A-42F5-AF65-21E08058220FQ41711915-60DA6707-7770-4767-83EE-547F627900C2Q44645850-2815E066-B849-4B26-B5C1-518DD064206DQ47171778-86A6891E-2EA0-4E13-8DC2-AD3D8EA1F455Q47439846-1907B214-3ABF-459F-A9C3-F810A3A733A6Q47659370-08C1A3FD-81B6-49AD-A9FA-07C37B2C5970Q47910408-BEA93CD4-E379-4FF0-A402-B22B2E202F31Q47933896-06A30B78-2AEF-4621-9625-248809AE02FEQ48246883-5D0A6319-397C-476B-B8D1-45B69E834F41Q48273613-B86B9936-5239-49EF-87A8-40152106EFE1Q50513075-8D7A9049-32C8-4345-A6B3-AEACEE962AD6Q52564714-CB419BB7-5C09-483D-8CED-0C09CDD2AE49Q54007639-9E70B6F2-87D4-4883-A4E2-03FA39CBC694Q55362299-E7E2A7DA-700A-4810-843E-03BE2A5D65E3Q57139656-910826C2-65CB-4468-9488-EB79AF157416
P2860
Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
@en
type
label
Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
@en
prefLabel
Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
@en
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
@en
P2093
Clarence D Kreiter
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/MEDU.12283
P577
2013-12-01T00:00:00Z