EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review.

EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38181402

about

Targeting BRAF aberrations in advanced colorectal carcinoma: from bench to bedside.Involving patients in a multidisciplinary European consensus process and in the development of a 'patient summary of the consensus document for colon and rectal cancer care'.Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.Improving clinical outcomes through centralization of rectal cancer surgery and clinical audit: a mixed-methods assessment.

P2860

Q38652294-E312D00A-5DF3-46ED-B6E5-20714A055342 Q39186394-240912C0-1B71-44AE-8DF4-3790F1B1B8C8 Q46067914-5867F379-EF88-4B27-832F-58DF15E9D009 Q50894550-D21F2BCA-D949-48D3-8AAF-35C6FC88FB9D

P2860

EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38181402

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... he pathologists expert review.

@en

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... he pathologists expert review.

@en-gb

type

label

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... he pathologists expert review.

@en

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... he pathologists expert review.

@en-gb

prefLabel

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... he pathologists expert review.

@en

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... he pathologists expert review.

@en-gb

P1433

Q38181402-03754F09-236E-4D78-8D91-244827F1E016

P1476

Q38181402-B886F38A-F899-4825-A7CD-F0514989F511

P2093

Q38181402-966ABBEB-C36B-4732-A8DC-134976076779

P2860

Q38181402-0E550870-A0CC-4224-8336-FBA7E9BDB2B4

Q38181402-26FC15C9-071B-4287-B442-5AA4252FFDCF

Q38181402-2B422062-AD3C-4E78-9B88-122842D2AC1A

Q38181402-2DD3D54E-2F59-489A-9B31-BF0EAC8D2F05

Q38181402-4566E1AA-EC41-4E36-B21B-DDDBD142B4D7

Q38181402-47833D63-E89C-4695-A9C4-DDD83AFFE786

Q38181402-4E6F7E36-7B73-45EC-8C77-C2EE6AE88BE2

Q38181402-540E3DAF-8836-4AD1-A311-24B3CCC36137

Q38181402-65B38CE2-D69B-4FE1-93B8-A2E80B1E9A5B

Q38181402-66EF54D5-5A48-4492-B964-AE079E433E03

P2888

Q38181402-DC833A7C-FA8A-4947-844F-25C78F613A2F

P304

Q38181402-2F4E9A45-BEC4-4DC9-9C81-F673497F45A3

P31

Q38181402-606D5A6A-FC85-4649-AC7C-4F013024EE0D

P356

Q38181402-7C584163-580C-42F6-AD31-DF90AB35A6EB

P433

Q38181402-D9764CF0-CA52-4B3E-94A8-AAA0D96BD942

P478

Q38181402-67B3F215-52D9-4477-9636-F6563C25E22D

P50

Q38181402-04487C0B-A864-4265-9A8C-31CB1A9DD33D

Q38181402-FE8A2E96-D09D-47D8-B0F6-A595200E9EE2

P577

Q38181402-F0856B52-4AA9-4E05-9028-78C66BD0773B

P698

Q38181402-730CAA65-0B49-41BE-8D19-1B2E64FFD98F

P921

Q38181402-3C1A8AEB-621D-41C0-A6E4-3576792C41F5

P356

S00428-013-1534-X

P1433

Virchows Archiv

P1476

EURECCA consensus conference h ...... the pathologists expert review

@en

P2093

I D Nagtegaal

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.

Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.

Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.

Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.

A uniform residual tumor (R) classification: integration of the R classification and the circumferential margin status.

The Importance of the Pathologist's Role in Assessment of the Quality of the Mesorectum.

The future of the TNM staging system in colorectal cancer: time for a debate?

What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer is dependent on many factors--the role of the tumor, the patient, the surgeon, the radiotherapist, and the pathologist.

Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.

P2888

s00428-013-1534-x

P304

129-134

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00428-013-1534-X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

464

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Nicholas P. West

P577

2014-01-24T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

24458515

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

colorectal cancer