Critical comments on the WHO-UNEP State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
about
Using systematic reviews for hazard and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicalsThe epidemiologic evidence linking prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals with male reproductive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysisEDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting ChemicalsBisphenol-A: epigenetic reprogramming and effects on reproduction and behaviorPeer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than 'sound science', should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicalsMetabolism Disrupting Chemicals and Metabolic DisordersHuman cost burden of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals. A critical review.A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals.Methodological issues in human studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals.Reprogramming of the Epigenome by MLL1 Links Early-Life Environmental Exposures to Prostate Cancer Risk.Comparing effect levels of regulatory studies with endpoints derived in targeted anti-androgenic studies: example prochloraz.Toxicology: a discipline in need of academic anchoring--the point of view of the German Society of Toxicology.Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in River Niger, Nigeria: Occurrence, distribution and composition profiles.Principles of Pharmacology and Toxicology Also Govern Effects of Chemicals on the Endocrine System.Evidence of the Possible Harm of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Humans: Ongoing Debates and Key Issues.Disrupting regulation: understanding industry engagement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals
P2860
Q28079859-957C6F93-DB72-4E5E-A1E6-43FB806FD576Q28079984-6C35364B-DD88-4A0D-8822-BD721E500D87Q28383132-D061DE2A-B2F6-45AA-9AFE-998CEFC73838Q28391200-1C7AC17E-37F3-4F7B-BE24-580B30277155Q28559107-862DFD79-9228-4F91-99A7-98E227E8B208Q29248099-6CB726B5-75F7-4040-9FDC-62A23785D5B5Q30234405-258718DF-B55C-4295-ACAC-D66D7B04DDCAQ34981379-092EE417-CE58-40B0-A111-9C30B586D41AQ38734931-194140C5-48A3-4EC1-A40B-9F95D5DF7D89Q39740172-F6798123-C188-419B-9DB9-6058CBA8663AQ39969308-E0C8E22A-4D2D-48A5-9E0D-47C7A54FD5D9Q42584168-81542E17-F9C9-4E46-A96A-F8376D688674Q47785327-9915B659-A0AD-42D3-B0B1-4C3832B84784Q52660512-D5A99F16-56FB-46BD-879B-3D262A46CA1FQ55176957-379350F9-4CCF-43E4-86E9-5B4F962F9F12Q59318572-BEA8CC9F-CA9D-4D0F-9FBD-F09A5F94F826
P2860
Critical comments on the WHO-UNEP State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Critical comments on the WHO-U ...... e Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
@en
type
label
Critical comments on the WHO-U ...... e Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
@en
prefLabel
Critical comments on the WHO-U ...... e Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
@en
P2093
P1476
Critical comments on the WHO-U ...... e Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
@en
P2093
Amy L Williams
Gerard Swaen
Glen Van Der Kraak
James C Lamb
Jane Staveley
Julie E Goodman
Karyn L Hentz
Lorenz R Rhomberg
Warren G Foster
P356
10.1016/J.YRTPH.2014.02.002
P407
P577
2014-02-13T00:00:00Z