Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
about
Conditionals, Context, and the Suppression Effect.Causal conditionals and counterfactuals.The dual reading of general conditionals: The influence of abstract versus concrete contexts.More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning.Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias.When will is not the same as should: The role of modals in reasoning with legal conditionals.Conditional reasoning, frequency of counterexamples, and the effect of response modality.
P2860
Q30384085-81E47D14-0F84-4152-888C-82596E37162AQ36852686-D4DC6240-88C2-4590-BDB7-9CD760D603AAQ38379665-E95E245A-A3ED-434F-BB09-95E528BCBB63Q38476818-D24A10EE-6BC5-4091-95F6-F343A9087099Q47695550-E2F057C6-A4BF-4EE8-AB86-FE75D3848ECBQ47984513-36833DA1-96B7-4249-9DEC-66183704EBC8Q51907227-FD66BE39-A59E-4384-ACDC-BD9D63603E8B
P2860
Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
@en
type
label
Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
@en
prefLabel
Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
@en
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
@en
P2093
Klaus Oberauer
Sonja M Geiger
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.3758/BF03192938
P577
2007-12-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1009606798