The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.
about
Utility of critical items within the Recognition Memory Test and Word Choice Test.Apparent effect of type of compensation seeking (disability versus litigation) on performance validity test scores may be due to other factors.Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) in a large sample of credible and noncredible patients referred for neuropsychological testing.Reporting of symptoms associated with concussion by OEF/OIF/OND Veterans: Comparison between research and clinical contexts.Embedded performance validity tests within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised.An investigation of the validity of the MMPI-2 response bias scale using an analog simulation design.Combining the test of memory malingering trial 1 with behavioral responses improves the detection of effort test failure.Effectiveness of the Comalli Stroop Test as a measure of negative response bias.High specificity of the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test in groups with severe verbal memory impairment.Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered.Re-examination of the Rey Word Recognition Test.Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: a clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature.Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment.Intent to fail: significance testing of forced choice test results.[Formula: see text]Determination of the smoking gun of intent: significance testing of forced choice results in social security claimants.The power of timing: Adding a time-to-completion cutoff to the Word Choice Test and Recognition Memory Test improves classification accuracy.Elevations on select Conners' CPT-II scales indicate noncredible responding in adults with traumatic brain injury.Non-credible language deficits following mild traumatic brain injury.A single error is one too many: Examining alternative cutoffs on Trial 2 of the TOMM.A comparison of the degree of effort involved in the TOMM and the ACS Word Choice Test using a dual-task paradigm.The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the test of memory malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance.Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the Word Memory Test.Further examination of embedded performance validity indicators for the Conners' Continuous Performance Test and Brief Test of Attention in a large outpatient clinical sample.Further consideration of Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice: comparison to the Recognition Memory Test-words and classification accuracy in a clinical sample.Detection of insufficient effort using the advanced clinical solutions for the Wechsler Memory Scale, fourth edition.Effectiveness of symptom validity measures in identifying cognitive and behavioral symptom exaggeration in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Penile transplantation: the US experience and institutional program set-up
P2860
Q38375529-24A069EE-7176-4F25-9903-2B3177D5BB51Q38390394-C9B5D357-B503-4925-A3F2-1BB8724A97B8Q38741384-97D5647E-F905-4976-A09C-F81BECCE8B79Q38746721-FFD5A885-5766-47C0-AEDC-5670F44173E0Q39272666-98C68D51-2F2D-4317-B57D-1A4CC04E0656Q43455030-B41F266E-9027-420B-A167-C82BF6EDC8CBQ43928357-F0B5BF63-ACDD-409C-91EA-F8D61AE9642CQ44593482-5EC18DA0-C0DF-47D9-B08C-7FBAB115EF34Q44614216-AC074D1C-7E0C-4E93-914D-77E7055E1A77Q45281595-70A0D7BE-91EC-4395-A44B-C65FE7FFD95DQ46719590-B6A074AD-23F6-43C6-99B1-C4BD8997C1F5Q47403337-5A814D65-DE43-4CCD-B63D-13F322B5C15CQ47642193-9B87E818-388E-4E3C-937A-B33AD0AFB512Q47711436-1B6CED13-325C-4241-8A9B-E124FFD9FE27Q47801139-37313243-1CC5-4E2B-B743-0645259E845DQ47831727-8AB7C13D-5252-4E27-8D2D-8B6DAEC40BC5Q48040562-E0D14CFC-1138-402E-8B9D-7A1963291B74Q48135895-99F08E1E-7C7F-41FD-95A0-4480B7DCB476Q48221220-DEFDD786-6BC0-4C7A-8B80-4B4AF925C4E3Q48607805-D501ACFC-C99A-473D-B002-838A5FC67642Q48690072-EBC3A227-C092-41A9-994E-9088C799C358Q50535930-D5D090D5-6D42-42C6-B4FA-5F5DB70A584AQ50582080-D5FC544E-2045-49E0-914D-5A59D731873AQ50625091-7FAEDDCD-57D4-46C2-8B39-32257FEB2222Q51022914-4957EBDD-2A70-496D-9762-A19C1174BE02Q51037365-D78D8E74-009C-4545-BF91-F2560FA8ECCCQ58804603-B943101D-2257-46E9-A993-833D0C155BA7
P2860
The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
2009年论文
@zh
2009年论文
@zh-cn
name
The Warrington Recognition Mem ...... ible and noncredible subjects.
@en
type
label
The Warrington Recognition Mem ...... ible and noncredible subjects.
@en
prefLabel
The Warrington Recognition Mem ...... ible and noncredible subjects.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
The Warrington Recognition Mem ...... ible and noncredible subjects.
@en
P2093
Elizabeth A Ziegler
Kyle B Boone
Maria E Cottingham
Michelle A Zeller
Michelle S Kim
Sarah D Marion
Stacy Amano
Tara Victor
P356
10.1093/ARCLIN/ACP088
P577
2009-11-11T00:00:00Z