Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
about
A decline in prosocial language helps explain public disapproval of the US CongressThe implications of company‐sponsored messages disguised as word‐of‐mouthMarkers of deception in italian speechLinguistic correlates of asymmetric motor symptom severity in Parkinson's Disease.Speaking under pressure: low linguistic complexity is linked to high physiological and emotional stress reactivityComplex questions asked by defense lawyers but not prosecutors predicts convictions in child abuse trials.Culture moderates changes in linguistic self-presentation and detail provision when deceiving others.Linguistic traces of a scientific fraud: the case of Diederik StapelStrong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception.Can Learning a Foreign Language Foster Analytic Thinking?-Evidence from Chinese EFL Learners' Writings.The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.From Spin to Swindle: Identifying Falsification in Financial TextThe Effects of Repetition on Children's True and False Reports.How Children Report True and Fabricated Stressful and Non-Stressful Events.Sexual Self-Schemas in the Real World: Investigating the Ecological Validity of Language-Based Markers of Childhood Sexual Abuse.Writing styles of a Korean sample by age: an exploratory study.Language use in emotional writing.Affective biases in English are bi-dimensional.The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event.TACIT: An open-source text analysis, crawling, and interpretation tool.Positive thinking about the future in newspaper reports and presidential addresses predicts economic downturn.A linguistic investigation of mediators between religious commitment and health behaviors in older adolescents.Am I who I say I am? Unobtrusive self-representation and personality recognition on Facebook.A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying the Thought Markers of Suicidal Subjects: A Prospective Multicenter Trial.Characteristics and Correlates of Word Use in Physician-Patient Communication.Communication between physicians and patients with suspected or diagnosed binge eating disorder.Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.Natural language indicators of differential gene regulation in the human immune system.The Narrative of Men Who Murder Their Partners: How Reliable Is It?Frankly, We Do Give a Damn: The Relationship Between Profanity and Honesty.Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text SamplesDeception detection from written accounts.Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis.Examining Differences in Audience Recall and Reaction Between Mediated Portrayals of Mental Illness as Trivializing Versus Stigmatizing.Power Versus Affiliation in Political Ideology: Robust Linguistic Evidence for Distinct Motivation-Related Signatures.Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind.Social indicators of deception.Contextually appropriate emotional word use predicts adaptive health behavior: Emotion context sensitivity and treatment adherence.True and intentionally fabricated memories.
P2860
Q28646358-3C046AAC-670D-4A34-8206-96469BCCC390Q30047893-D7757830-0B8A-4403-B109-37372FEC9D0AQ30460828-E03B7651-69E6-407E-A5F5-F75020FF25B9Q30476582-8E13FB47-DD9E-4AC3-819C-32BD2E0CCD58Q33762861-FE4CA88E-671B-4EBD-A16A-C009FB63BB3CQ33797106-5110DA3C-43FC-4D9E-A0F2-7ED0261D3858Q33861988-A9CBC211-76A5-4C5E-AEBA-E3F793FC15D8Q35230898-521CEF4D-92E3-48B5-9D7A-A27435B15BB7Q36039615-660C8CCD-59F9-40DF-9EDD-E1BE3A029A26Q36163799-848F139E-C35D-43BF-AF9B-A7FD90E7016AQ36264846-01A7AED0-BB54-4B64-887D-69763C8F421CQ37168521-1392947A-EFB5-454F-A481-19C9053CEE51Q37324709-298C7660-8496-4A4A-9E4F-C5CDA3AA3C01Q37653509-496CC19F-728A-46B5-BA53-52ECC779D073Q38374116-76AC728D-5A2A-49C2-ABF4-D30C438C109AQ38374312-97C26FDA-00A5-4881-B621-C27CB8FB823DQ38413473-5B2CF2C7-38EE-4EC0-BFFD-0C7519E0EE4BQ38422264-47EB05C3-0173-4326-8041-7E5143838359Q38445380-05113205-EFBE-4E51-ABBF-52E2014BDE8AQ38621148-C86944D7-0C4A-413F-9FAE-AB24E14660B4Q38761315-43FDD5CC-3015-478C-8BD2-190A0A9BD74DQ39256150-539B7675-C2F2-4E9C-B4EE-B157BAEAE900Q40171799-E5E4F0C2-9661-4DBC-9BB6-69C455905872Q41677557-EA3767A3-D7AD-42BE-80DC-324D61AF7EE1Q44388201-F9069488-EA09-438D-9CB3-7766A5CBA772Q44588737-57E4EA31-1501-4AF3-8485-A77008DBB2EEQ45018748-7E67EAC4-37A7-4DA6-A8A0-0C029136AC47Q46060610-10FD7D17-2104-4EB8-BC8A-29591E853A87Q46557902-3A991418-D427-4F63-B980-5FBBF9118C64Q46743922-3DAE15C3-2A39-4FCC-82B2-B72520FAC6F1Q47137034-55D5E5B9-5448-4FCE-94C8-2A822CDDE19CQ47146424-DB8FFB44-9977-475B-A0F7-C4DAE42ACFA6Q47236067-7670467C-BEA2-4B3F-85E7-7EF7870C71F6Q47429321-F8290436-7928-4212-9C57-4FF301128C7DQ47599756-D702BE2A-F146-4155-B944-70E71A4169F1Q47637957-4BF21944-5680-477D-8CD1-1B10541C41ECQ47733166-FB5B6AB1-6C54-4E71-B09F-6D3788A99E01Q47774050-A19883D7-BAD2-4F82-9099-FA9925D2815DQ47879480-F129312C-D354-41AB-8D21-28F69173AE13Q47943668-3B4CC50A-D579-4494-A8CB-2AC93E87CC48
P2860
Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
@en
type
label
Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
@en
prefLabel
Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
@en
P2093
P1476
Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.
@en
P2093
Diane S Berry
Jane M Richards
Matthew L Newman
P304
P356
10.1177/0146167203029005010
P577
2003-05-01T00:00:00Z