Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
about
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rankWhy has the number of scientific retractions increased?Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural ReformsMisconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publicationsPublication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.A comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literatureEvidence-informed person-centered healthcare part I: do 'cognitive biases plus' at organizational levels influence quality of evidence?Medical research misconduct need regulatory reforms.A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature.Scientific Misconduct in India: Causes and Perpetuation.Summa cum fraude: how to prevent scientific misconduct.Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countriesVisibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study.Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good signShould we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews?Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned BehaviorThreats to Moral Identity: Testing the Effects of Incentives and Consequences of One's Actions on Moral CleansingCompleteness of Follow-Up Determines Validity of Study Findings: Results of a Prospective Repeated Measures Cohort Study.Criminals in the Citadel and Deceit all along the Watchtower: Irresponsibility, Fraud, and Complicity in the Search for Scientific Truth.Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic reviewInformation Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice.Doctors and medical science.Writing for publication in a medical journal.Promoting research integrity in Africa: an African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward.Review article: the role of practice guidelines and evidence-based medicine in perioperative patient safety.Plagiarism in scientific writing: words or ideas?Authors, editors, and the signs, symptoms and causes of plagiarism.The reproducibility of biomedical research: Sleepers awake!Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring.The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.Knowledge and attitude of dental professionals of north India toward plagiarism.Publication fraud, dishonesty, and deceit.Research fraud and its combat: what can a journal do?Fraud and Freud: is there an association in scientific misconduct?Retracted publications in the drug literature.Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016).Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey.Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey.
P2860
Q21129393-8B6715B0-6914-47F8-878F-FCF84CE38D35Q21132700-9E39B5FB-9DAB-41CF-84F1-82A5A17CA303Q24289108-95A93250-B6CA-4E14-9755-5D236B0499F7Q24289259-C5D977FA-FE95-4E62-A575-F758C53FDE69Q24289398-4BC0B062-AFB5-4D04-98F4-76030FE97FDDQ27024924-50F45806-251E-4B4C-B96B-20BD6D1AF4ECQ30368983-928F7AAF-C255-4EE5-89A6-8ECC9F5227ECQ34432397-51FA24CC-0F0B-416B-AE65-E5430DAD2D2AQ34463408-F1CF8F71-22E6-4671-A258-6958652CB051Q34486250-CEEF8A0B-5CF2-4003-B163-11EC29E15714Q34579829-935CE2B7-D4D4-46A1-97BA-9337F40E7AFDQ34649377-1D788B69-C885-490D-B4DB-B16F77D9C4CFQ34778097-9C92C797-E08B-49BC-A107-13413F4C725EQ35060121-77BCA63E-198D-48EC-92E8-AE7AD58DE01CQ35218627-C0A58611-657C-4F63-B69C-DF558EF24E40Q35556111-C18D238E-796D-447F-9FAE-E1B98D259A6AQ35743905-49A6CEB8-062F-4B07-9E80-9C2ABFB9053AQ35808420-607A6681-C6E2-4B99-B3DB-388A0C624394Q35964333-C483A658-6E45-4A85-A812-A80CAE1D8A15Q36063705-B4B7DFF9-717F-4BF1-A4ED-D9DA94CE0A54Q36115362-93B97754-4BA9-42EA-9605-4C8379B593BEQ36233762-01D89564-82B4-4897-BEB2-7037976CDF3AQ36436489-BD486C74-401D-4CDC-8043-073408867E9DQ37038641-7E9EA3B2-B2DF-466D-BF8C-0502A1AD83F0Q38065113-D7CB255A-79D1-441D-8D18-13C2A84FC27CQ38256893-73F45665-2F75-4189-805C-A5A3CD16C89DQ38334898-F0E2FD6F-7E34-4716-A31E-83E0EC40865AQ39023051-13D418AE-5D01-40C5-8D00-FDF1FD643A34Q40316879-8B049F18-C7EA-4328-B29E-8986BA63B8E7Q41712850-B2E57AA0-FD52-47B9-A3BF-EF791075FE25Q41987344-BCE3304D-F00F-4E6F-AFDA-1AF46571FE6EQ42177669-CE0AEC09-69C5-49DE-B5C8-CCA8997A9A48Q46175047-1C1E563F-6872-495D-9F11-D9DB481803B8Q46395697-1F859A89-0770-4877-9B6C-68F3F9D4E057Q47771466-61AAABD4-2CFA-4158-98A2-39FB907C4017Q48007440-DEB6B06D-3D6D-4772-A005-D119F0B25AD3Q48119283-91275F66-4D6E-4B67-A7AD-B0F3B8D4C4DFQ48257667-D4AB5876-73D5-4E02-A9FD-0F0345BE4E0EQ48506072-22299E89-47B2-4233-B8FE-1B305A91E1EDQ49595409-E4556667-4F98-4DB6-920F-FAE5A254A6B5
P2860
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
@en
type
label
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
@en
prefLabel
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
@en
P356
P1476
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
@en
P2093
R Grant Steen
P304
P356
10.1136/JME.2010.038125
P577
2010-11-15T00:00:00Z