The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case.

The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38510590
Quantitative evaluation of recall and precision of CAT Crawler, a search engine specialized on retrieval of Critically Appraised TopicsThe effectiveness of the practice of correction and republication in the biomedical literature.Funding source and research report quality in nutrition practice-related research.Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study.Research ethics in the post-genomic era.The reproducibility of biomedical research: Sleepers awake!Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine.The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.Retracted science and the retraction index.Reporting research, retraction of results, and responsibility.
P2860

The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38510590
description
1994 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1994年の論文
@ja
1994年論文
@yue
1994年論文
@zh-hant
1994年論文
@zh-hk
1994年論文
@zh-mo
1994年論文
@zh-tw
1994年论文
@wuu
1994年论文
@zh
1994年论文
@zh-cn
name
The scientific community's res ...... tion. The Robert Slutsky case.
@en
type
label
The scientific community's res ...... tion. The Robert Slutsky case.
@en
prefLabel
The scientific community's res ...... tion. The Robert Slutsky case.
@en
P1433
P1476
P2093
P304
P31
P356
P407
P433
P478
P577
P698
P356
P1433
P1476
The scientific community's res ...... tion. The Robert Slutsky case.
@en
P2093
P304
P31
P356
10.1001/JAMA.1994.03520020096029
P407
P433
P478
P577
P698