What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?

What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38544412
Defending the boundaries of science: AIDS denialism, peer review and the Medical Hypotheses sagaAre Social Scientists Harder on Their Colleagues Than Physical Scientists Were on Theirs in the Past? Commentary on Trafimow & Rice (2009).Problems, Pitfalls, and Promise in the Peer-Review Process: Commentary on Trafimow & Rice (2009).Commentary: Reproducibility in Psychological Science: When Do Psychological Phenomena Exist?It's a just world no matter which way you look at it.Using a sharp instrument to parse apart strategy and consistency: an evaluation of PPT and its assumptions.Multiple Trials May Yield Exaggerated Effect Size EstimatesAuthor-suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journalHow Likely Are Impressive Benefits to Ensue From Simulation-Driven Big Neuroscience?
P2860

What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38544412
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
2009年论文
@zh
2009年论文
@zh-cn
name
What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?
@en
type
label
What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?
@en
prefLabel
What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?
@en
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P5875
P698
P356
P1433
P1476
What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
10.1111/J.1745-6924.2009.01107.X
P433
P478
P577
P5875
P698