Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
about
Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychologySocial science. Promoting transparency in social science research.US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer researchAcademic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and HypercompetitionBibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the SciencesLessons from the first two years of operating a study registryIntroduction to the Special Section on Research Practices.Data fraud in clinical trials.Construct labeling: public trust and scientific credibility.Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorshipPublic-Medicine Dissonance: Why in a World of Evidence-based Medicine?Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions.Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?A systematic review of context bias in invasion biologyEnhancing predictive accuracy and reproducibility in clinical evaluation research: Commentary on the special section of the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content.Replication Requires Psychological Rather than Statistical Hypotheses: The Case of Eye Movements Enhancing Word Recollection.Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic?The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.Article retracted, but the message lives on.Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.Scientific disintegrity as a public bad.The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication.Replication in music psychologyResearch practices and assessment of research misconductThe changing forms and expectations of peer review
P2860
Q24273339-1B089B16-FB5E-4BE8-8630-D540FF8057D9Q24289118-115BD237-67E2-4EB6-A3F9-F0EC1432074AQ24289257-E2BF092A-F347-45DF-84C6-2D7105882755Q27033640-1150FC07-3A21-4324-B12E-A1BAA9590F0DQ27313418-2DF23AFB-C21A-4FE7-B1AE-DCFCF7B70A6AQ28649779-B1EF2568-C234-4A91-A135-5E7DE1AA4810Q30459716-587F4788-CA2D-4494-AC1C-B2E6B775A905Q30902176-E0BC73F0-EC55-4372-BF03-DA6417160FD8Q35698293-40C7CD4A-0638-4D89-9B1F-08AB41704D2EQ35868844-5826161D-D85C-4C5E-86A6-0387D7BF0737Q36218463-6768BF2A-657D-4291-B805-2853818E3CF1Q36303806-2659C428-EBFB-4DD9-B464-13D5684A3CA5Q37130633-0C4C8E97-EADC-4470-98EF-A1CAD8396DC4Q38337654-F8DB447F-D8A2-4370-B735-67485FABFD67Q38619931-85F88603-9F11-4DF6-A908-E4ADAE55A4C5Q39015280-0A15624D-E009-4867-AEF6-641EC34EB102Q39065716-46CC9114-DFDA-4F72-BBEA-6AAE7275DD0BQ39828128-EA06260E-EFA4-4624-B3EA-A80F1A564582Q40738653-88982B88-0FC6-4167-825A-9E934284D348Q41712850-0941401A-0207-4F44-9949-EB7330E1AAD2Q45390020-B4D7CDA5-0900-4E7E-A2C4-CA55A2866D5FQ47136742-729AB9DA-A87C-47E4-96D3-2098A4282172Q47253958-3B62702B-3624-4EDD-92ED-425D38EC2C23Q47650795-76D42C6C-8696-4850-8757-535158CDDB41Q55059196-9FAE19F1-4AE6-4558-8ECC-DFF9307714AAQ57748705-BEAAF048-099A-4F41-B379-9CF17E7BDDA5Q57814172-4552A4B8-34DD-46DC-BF3F-13856B4CA162Q58713992-CFDD4C03-997B-4274-945D-E0A0298003C0
P2860
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
@en
type
label
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
@en
prefLabel
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
@en
P2093
Russell Spears
Wolfgang Stroebe
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/1745691612460687
P50
P577
2012-11-01T00:00:00Z