Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey.

about

Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies

P2860

Q55456403-54130444-B33D-4DB3-8672-21D0AC1CCE6E Q58782654-84B8869D-29BD-4E81-BD70-34D369348A44

P2860

Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38625504

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

Trading certainty for speed - ...... iews: an international survey.

@en

type

Item

label

Trading certainty for speed - ...... iews: an international survey.

@en

prefLabel

Trading certainty for speed - ...... iews: an international survey.

@en

P1476

Trading certainty for speed - ...... views: an international survey

@en

P2093

Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gerald Gartlehner

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Judith Greimel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians

A scoping review of rapid review methods

What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review

Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods.

Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions.

Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.

Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.

Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.

How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.

Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy.

P2888

s12874-017-0406-5

P304

121

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S12874-017-0406-5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Agustín Ciapponi

Gernot Wagner

P577

2017-08-14T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1091206446

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

28806999

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5557322

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey.

about

P2860

P2860

Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P932