A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?

about

Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients.Safety and efficacy of a two-screw cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fracture fixation: a retrospective case series in 264 patients

P2860

Q47255805-57266C94-E4BF-46EC-9AE4-C1265A1C27D6 Q58608390-71F4D997-4E00-472E-8488-9590A0C8F544

P2860

A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38633313

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

A six-year retrospective analy ...... considered the best parameter?

@en

type

Item

label

A six-year retrospective analy ...... considered the best parameter?

@en

prefLabel

A six-year retrospective analy ...... considered the best parameter?

@en

P1476

A six-year retrospective analy ...... considered the best parameter?

@en

P2093

A Gildone

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

G Salvatori

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

G Valpiani

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

L Massari

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M Bonomo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults

3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.

Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients.

What is the relevance of the tip-apex distance as a predictor of lag screw cut-out?

Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Comparing the Intramedullary Nailing Method Versus Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Comparative study of the second and third generation of gamma nail for trochanteric fractures: review of 218 cases.

Index for rating diagnostic tests

Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN).

P304

481-488

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0299.R1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Vincenzo Lorusso

Gaetano Caruso

P577

2017-08-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28790037

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5579311

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?

about

P2860

P2860

A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P932