Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

about

Innovation in neurosurgery-response to: "IDEAL", the operating microscope, and the parachute.Innovation in neurosurgery response to: "Ideal", the operating microscope, and the parachute.Innovation in neurosurgery."IDEAL", the operating microscope, and the parachute.

P2860

Q47915016-125F8174-E3AF-49E2-B8C2-03C2BA7DB9E1 Q48103168-0591CE61-9CCF-4FF2-85BC-C35F2BCA57BA Q48227823-D3FF1D67-19D8-4B39-9875-428080C9B9AB Q49629797-BA78E0B5-6AA2-4142-A972-C9D1080069AB

P2860

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38638540

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

@en

type

Item

label

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

@en

prefLabel

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

@en

P1476

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

@en

P2093

A H Zamanipoor Najafabadi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A L Bredenoord

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A M May

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

I S Muskens

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J T Senders

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M L D Broekman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

S J H Diederen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

T R Smith

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

W R van Furth

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Interventions in randomised controlled trials in surgery: issues to consider during trial design

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery

Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review.

How does medical device regulation perform in the United States and the European union? A systematic review

Endonasal transsphenoidal removal of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: technical note.

Endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base meningiomas: the significance of a "cortical cuff" and brain edema compared with careful case selection and surgical experience in predicting morbidity and extent of resection.

Fusing Randomized Trials With Big Data: The Key to Self-learning Health Care Systems?

Endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to the jugular tubercle.

Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales.

P2888

s00701-017-3280-3

P31

scholarly article

review article

P356

10.1007/S00701-017-3280-3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P5008

ScienceSource

P577

2017-08-06T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

2017-10-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28780715

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

intracranial aneurysm

P932

5590028

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

about

P2860

P2860

Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P275

P2860

P2888

P31

P356

P5008

P577

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P275

P2860

P2888

P31

P356

P5008

P577

P698

P921

P932