about
sameAs
Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonographyQuantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography.A new full-field digital mammography system with and without the use of an advanced post-processing algorithm: comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.Low rates of additional cancer detection by magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who undergo preoperative mammography and ultrasonographyAn HR-MAS MR metabolomics study on breast tissues obtained with core needle biopsyLocation of triple-negative breast cancers: comparison with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers on MR imaging.False positive and false negative FDG-PET scans in various thoracic diseases.Validation of a scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia using an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsyComparison of new and established full-field digital mammography systems in diagnostic performance.Breast density change as a predictive surrogate for response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive breast cancer.Pictorial review: Unusual tumours involving the prostate: radiological-pathological findings.Does ultrasound-guided directional vacuum-assisted removal help eliminate abnormal nipple discharge in patients with benign intraductal single mass?Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of VX2 carcinoma in a rabbit model: comparison of 1.0-M gadobutrol and 0.5-M gadopentetate dimeglumine.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography.Contralateral lesions detected by preoperative MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer: application of MR CAD in differentiation of benign and malignant lesions.Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer.Ultrasonographic assessment of breast density.Survival outcomes of breast cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: association with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with computer-aided evaluation.Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer.Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses.Background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio at preoperative MR imaging: association with subsequent local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation surgery.Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics.Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography.Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.Residual Mammographic Microcalcifications and Enhancing Lesions on MRI After Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Correlation with Histopathologic Residual Tumor Size.Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.Shear-Wave Elastography for the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Quantitative analysis of breast echotexture patterns in automated breast ultrasound images.Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations.Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.Tumour volume doubling time of molecular breast cancer subtypes assessed by serial breast ultrasound.Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound images using quantitative tissue clustering.Quantitative analysis for breast density estimation in low dose chest CT scans.18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.Automatic detection of microcalcifications in breast ultrasound.Rapid breast density analysis of partial volumes of automated breast ultrasound images.
P50
Q30417288-0645ED91-82EA-49C6-94A2-FCE40D6D7BA8Q30424166-929F2A38-5E25-47FA-8EDB-E8C1B25C6F91Q30436702-29AB5CEB-2A0A-4C71-9263-13B84F528017Q33620172-563D8945-7754-4B2A-A0E3-AEFCBDB8F2C6Q33874994-53E524CE-6737-4392-9A35-FF92F6706262Q33875828-A7FC385B-2E2D-49FB-80FC-C7BA04421B9EQ34058288-B2ABFBAD-867F-4374-BBF5-910D045AF3B1Q34995516-42AE81CB-FDA8-4F49-96B0-3A519296C5F5Q36426674-EE1BDB8F-F433-4B25-9D02-7B54615CEDF4Q36525814-F6605283-E015-4C3F-9C46-00CAEAE9F7BEQ36662523-D868D2D4-E7CF-4288-8B4B-99D159B5E2A1Q36924504-4E33EA4F-2304-43B4-884F-73F17359166DQ37229077-9E8C32C5-138E-4D5F-97E0-D50AD79F208CQ37406487-D01F2473-237D-42C4-A9B6-82C59A174276Q37784372-27FA80D0-16DA-4670-B641-0D1109BA36D2Q37790182-DD947A0D-301A-4272-9C39-09A7A7CDFE7AQ37844362-627BCC4A-1766-4FCD-847E-17AF0DFB4728Q37865908-9288FDD6-288A-43E2-9BAA-47A6BDCF7906Q38074936-DD290179-25E0-4477-9981-7F2B043389AFQ38097368-72831412-904A-46A4-BC58-A913FB639296Q38099631-D20CB28D-0036-45ED-8048-D81C747995D1Q38106851-C982C858-1796-420F-B364-98732EEEDDBCQ38136869-D9216E6B-B1D6-43C2-BAEC-613439B18178Q38152610-8A4BBDAB-FA88-4C93-9B28-47E57E4EED83Q38156277-F3E3F74C-B655-4D7C-9489-6E95AD355201Q38182629-E6264679-110C-48E2-9CAF-C558C4BB4DDFQ38222491-D4FBD843-96F4-4AA4-BD1E-4592AA976326Q38420000-8EF7840F-AD03-48F9-A7F7-5B115FD20E9EQ38422346-66ACDC5C-8B81-4D95-8FB8-614B0CBFB176Q38423166-4FC2D170-C552-438C-851C-58B9D8F9C8F7Q38423710-0C13B30B-E65F-484C-A861-B33ECF657314Q38431268-B9ED87F6-E1C0-4D93-A0A6-A6F523721057Q38433430-7201F008-9784-4099-8014-06A0AD441A6CQ38434514-96AB6F11-B680-4E7E-9FDA-307D8575FF0DQ38437589-131CB427-7CA1-4F6B-BA11-6E2834C70E8FQ38439714-D2C61F79-114C-44D9-BDE3-289EEB6CF8C2Q38440261-356B4FB7-6E1D-4DE8-8DD8-5CF135CA9E02Q38446353-57CAE49A-44CD-4C4F-99F8-4E44B64A495DQ38446464-FFCAE340-E8B9-4C1E-A399-7836881F8F83Q38446517-9F1EBAC9-E52C-4B19-881F-17481C527F1F
P50
description
onderzoeker
@nl
researcher
@en
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Jung Min Chang
@ast
Jung Min Chang
@en
Jung Min Chang
@es
Jung Min Chang
@sl
type
label
Jung Min Chang
@ast
Jung Min Chang
@en
Jung Min Chang
@es
Jung Min Chang
@sl
prefLabel
Jung Min Chang
@ast
Jung Min Chang
@en
Jung Min Chang
@es
Jung Min Chang
@sl
P106
P1153
56157112200
9246556000
P31
P496
0000-0001-5726-9797