Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews.

Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38647091

about

Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure Flavonoids for treating venous leg ulcers Assessing Risk in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease: When Should We Intensify Care and Follow-Up? Results from a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies of the COURAGE and FAME Era Digital interventions to promote self-management in adults with hypertension systematic review and meta-analysis Chromium picolinate for reducing body weight: meta-analysis of randomized trials Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions.Spatio-temporal gap analysis of OBIS-SEAMAP project data: assessment and way forward.Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically.Systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: methodology and literature search results.Developing methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: an example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 1. Identifying the literature.Negative pressure wound therapy: potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data Systematic searches for the effectiveness of respite care.Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care Systematic reviews and geriatric interventions--the need for scientific methodology.The association between atopy and childhood/adolescent leukemia: a meta-analysis.Systematic review and meta-analysis in anatomic pathology.Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.Elements of a systematic review.Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?Impact of access on TAVI procedural and midterm follow-up: a meta-analysis of 13 studies and 10,468 patients.Identifying the research question and planning the project Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?Addiction and spirituality.The Andersen Model of Total Patient Delay: a systematic review of its application in cancer diagnosis Interactive digital interventions to promote self-management in adults with asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Digital Interventions to Promote Self-Management in Adults With Hypertension: Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pre-harvest interventions to reduce the shedding of E. coli O157 in the faeces of weaned domestic ruminants: a systematic review.Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies.Appropriateness of fresh-frozen plasma usage in hospital settings: a meta-analysis of the impact of organizational interventions.Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature.Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94.The Effect of Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure on Medication Adherence and Lifestyle Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.Understanding Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [Formula: see text].Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review.Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014 Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis.Usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting literature searches. Secondary citation of work that was not published did not set good example

P2860

Q24235064-BE276359-428F-4020-A44B-D53D7DC6BCB4 Q24242532-A583664E-968F-4DB3-B064-E194CD61713A Q24244507-54F9EFA3-2E95-441A-B127-61BB54432684 Q24245953-D359FC81-15E7-4899-9A3D-4C8E3F517544 Q26745091-DB12BC76-F693-44AE-B0AC-4C793193AC29 Q28069305-46C06365-B82D-43B2-9266-F24ECFCDCAE2 Q28187180-9D5202BD-C2E5-4E8B-8CB1-78B75CC88C6C Q30475868-03ECBEF6-425B-4E8D-8467-72B4BFFBD287 Q30479444-E0D38D30-5159-4D68-BB7D-C6C6C503AFDC Q30748637-3017A63D-FB56-4EA1-8CD8-1707DCD43CC7 Q30835414-E3DBEE99-D8F9-4379-8B19-0899C50C4DA4 Q31106910-8613B986-E08F-43CB-9FD8-98A8F6B9DF35 Q31146292-88C4743F-B4E2-4618-8CC6-FEF90E9F511A Q33326429-BACBE55B-5631-4596-B4E1-0069B2CFB3E9 Q33738311-724BB49B-9612-4971-83BF-7E9152BDE930 Q33839126-010035BA-8BB3-4C68-8423-D14C37B32B82 Q33880914-6FD7468D-2E0A-4425-86F7-59AA9F2886F2 Q33940373-F198BED5-CB8F-4277-ADAB-2EAC15D7228B Q34036655-9957F637-BFFE-4437-82D4-60F635052AB6 Q34489209-CBFE082F-1167-4E93-9905-6B7BE241BDA6 Q34577246-079181FF-8BDC-44DC-9878-541A4BA01694 Q35241525-B1538BDE-8997-45CF-8559-D341F5615745 Q35338470-2A5A6797-E13D-4AC8-8FFB-B96F4C5B7DFE Q35420035-C8713CA6-8984-4935-8976-C0714E1FDB5E Q35743758-C9B131FA-0D14-4E50-AF71-03CC0D80F4F2 Q35913570-28AB48A1-4C8D-4730-9877-F5C746A57631 Q36026999-E8937412-3DC7-4E3F-8E69-F6FA07BCF58F Q36440882-43646DBE-B374-4DA8-B195-C7E3E2D18A06 Q36930942-AB544A16-366B-4B7E-AE25-29CC50FAB6A4 Q37188802-011330D0-C74C-413B-8A14-F5832049F423 Q37589646-CB2AB02D-2276-444D-93AC-93964CBDE023 Q38218264-94BAD399-8555-4BAB-B83C-937EC472B5A5 Q38260148-0A06EC8E-A059-43E8-BE19-5B20AB3234E4 Q38366010-F5F9772B-07D3-4791-9475-019FBC2921D6 Q38543123-6488C9F3-34F2-45CB-99EE-713EB8C9B159 Q38834454-87EB5867-88C6-4622-BF1B-F3117776C2E6 Q38945904-93A9F44F-3928-4D48-88CC-DAAA7F39197D Q39002267-89DF09A2-0D07-4DB0-937A-C02900D42143 Q41816841-676FF902-2B04-40FB-B9D3-0A5F72C2A221 Q42261175-23B4F10A-3441-4735-B1E6-8A13E1CC5728

P2860

Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38647091

description

1998 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

1998年の論文

@ja

1998年学术文章

@wuu

1998年学术文章

@zh-cn

1998年学术文章

@zh-hans

1998年学术文章

@zh-my

1998年学术文章

@zh-sg

1998年學術文章

@yue

1998年學術文章

@zh

1998年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Review of the usefulness of co ...... search for systematic reviews.

@en

type

label

Review of the usefulness of co ...... search for systematic reviews.

@en

prefLabel

Review of the usefulness of co ...... search for systematic reviews.

@en

P1433

Q38647091-9E441921-E902-4B9A-800E-FC6CCBF06805

P1476

Q38647091-16B819B2-8C88-49E4-920A-6E0AC8B8122D

P2093

Q38647091-015B69E1-F448-41A2-B0ED-09F281394A7F

Q38647091-21586EA9-AB10-41DA-A36A-50EECD47617E

Q38647091-2952FCAC-74D1-41F4-AFC0-A155D8EF5240

Q38647091-2D572E16-4ED7-4698-A12D-ECAF778A8CB4

Q38647091-7FD69767-BBEE-4F6A-8808-129A0343594E

Q38647091-826AE8E9-80BA-4490-A263-7860CC682456

Q38647091-A650A5E4-2AB8-43E3-AF68-C3B277DC6A2F

Q38647091-C6B9E7A6-68B8-4714-91A8-830B643C06F0

P2860

Q38647091-4184BF12-D510-48E9-9E04-ECE968EAC9AA

Q38647091-496858E0-8E2E-416D-BEEE-D9CFF0257BAB

Q38647091-66FDD716-5EB8-492E-9FCF-12CDF33351FB

Q38647091-7A91534E-3CFA-493C-A335-50EB80D026E9

P304

Q38647091-B5E1598B-BCF6-4BCB-B246-1111119EC13A

P31

Q38647091-A8750C8F-98A3-4791-8BFF-D43A03C32C8E

P356

Q38647091-B9E4F5D8-9B36-455B-9707-E3BE81EF0D73

P407

Q38647091-B34973A0-F772-45D4-8583-E6A94800B223

P433

Q38647091-A55AF675-9F7E-474A-A2AB-A98D5034BFCC

P478

Q38647091-F73B72C2-7CF4-4BD7-95EF-FFBD520F2E4F

P577

Q38647091-E2F1E234-D448-43AF-A5A5-702F7E50D6FE

P5875

Q38647091-AE2D26F8-D059-408F-A736-D6EBF70873AB

P698

Q38647091-A1484A85-9BCE-4EFC-8D98-7B72725BB43E

P932

Q38647091-D7DBE466-5C50-4B75-BBA3-29C6DCA023BF

P356

BMJ.317.7172.1562

P1433

P1476

Review of the usefulness of co ...... search for systematic reviews.

@en

P2093

B C Delaney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

C J Hyde

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

D A Fitzmaurice

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

F D Hobbs

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

R J McManus

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

R S Tobias

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

S Jowett

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

S Wilson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching

Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda

Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

A review of near patient testing in primary care.

P304

1562-1563

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.317.7172.1562

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

7172

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

317

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

1998-12-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

13450122

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

9836655

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

28735

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string