MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.

about

Strengthening the evidence-base of integrated care for people with multi-morbidity in Europe using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

P2860

Q57174840-711A5EC8-AF81-42A2-9C25-5E03A92253DD

P2860

MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38684565

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

MCDA swing weighting and discr ...... rences: a critical assessment.

@en

type

Item

label

MCDA swing weighting and discr ...... rences: a critical assessment.

@en

prefLabel

MCDA swing weighting and discr ...... rences: a critical assessment.

@en

P1476

MCDA swing weighting and discr ...... erences: a critical assessment

@en

P2093

Anne Rentz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Heather Gelhorn

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jiat-Ling Poon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Katharine S Gries

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kevin Marsh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice.

Improving the Validity of Stated-Preference Data in Health Research: The Potential of the Time-to-Think Approach.

Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.

Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.

Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.

Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared.

Does technique matter; a pilot study exploring weighting techniques for a multi-criteria decision support framework.

Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.

Addressing preference heterogeneity in public health policy by combining Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Proof of Method.

Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis.

P304

1483-1491

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1002/PDS.4255

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Sumitra Sribhashyam

Tommi Tervonen

P577

2017-07-11T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28696023

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.

about

P2860

P2860

MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698