Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications.

about

Management of burst fractures in the thoracolumbar spine.Incidence and risk factors for the misplacement of pedicle screws in scoliosis surgery assisted by O-arm navigation-analysis of a large series of one thousand, one hundred and forty five screws.

P2860

Q38894878-E62319C4-8369-49B9-85C1-05BF6B47067A Q52957575-3B98F1A1-8B5E-47CA-A4F2-18F93FD6F60F

P2860

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38778756

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Minimally invasive versus open ...... matic review of complications.

@en

type

Item

label

Minimally invasive versus open ...... matic review of complications.

@en

prefLabel

Minimally invasive versus open ...... matic review of complications.

@en

P1476

Minimally invasive versus open ...... matic review of complications.

@en

P2093

Baoyi Ke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jiandong Tang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Li Zhang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wei Hu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Xianpei Wu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.

Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis.

Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease

A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results.

Radiation exposure to the surgeon during open lumbar microdiscectomy and minimally invasive microdiscectomy: a prospective, controlled trial.

Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.

P2888

s00264-016-3153-z

P304

1883-1890

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00264-016-3153-Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-03-18T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

298909992

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1009775957

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26987979

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications.

about

P2860

P2860

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P5875

P6179

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P5875

P6179

P698