Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
about
Considerations for Infectious Disease Research Studies Using Animals.The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions: Why Harm-Benefit Analysis and Its Emphasis on Practical Benefit Jeopardizes the Credibility of Research.Retrospective harm benefit analysis of pre-clinical animal research for six treatment interventions.Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU.
P2860
Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
2016年论文
@zh
2016年论文
@zh-cn
name
Recommendations for Addressing ...... arm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
@en
type
label
Recommendations for Addressing ...... arm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
@en
prefLabel
Recommendations for Addressing ...... arm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Recommendations for Addressing ...... arm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
@en
P2093
Aurora Brønstad
Christian E Newcomer
Javier Guillen
Kathy Laber
P2860
P356
10.1177/0023677216642397
P433
P577
2016-06-01T00:00:00Z