Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
about
It may be easier to publish than correct or retract faulty biomedical literatureIs Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis.
P2860
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
@en
type
label
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
@en
prefLabel
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
@en
P2860
P1476
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
@en
P2093
Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11948-017-9873-7
P577
2017-02-23T00:00:00Z