Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

about

ETHICS OF SMART HOUSE WELFARE TECHNOLOGY FOR OLDER ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.Evaluating facts and facting evaluations: On the fact-value relationship in HTA.

P2860

Q47213522-A4004755-E9A0-4938-98B4-A84214DF6836 Q53832902-5623933D-B59B-4E84-8ACD-901B90C7776D

P2860

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q39057737

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@en

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@nl

type

Item

label

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@en

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@nl

prefLabel

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@en

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@nl

P1476

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

@en

P2860

Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel

Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in the elderly: updates and controversies

A comparative case study of bowel cancer screening in the UK and Australia: evidence lost in translation?

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology

Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype.

Does informed consent alter elderly patients' preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomized trial.

Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in the discussion of cancer screening: "between-" versus "within-" physician differences.

What is the most effective way to communicate results after endoscopy?

Colorectal cancer screening education, prioritization, and self-perceived preparedness among primary care residents: data from a national survey.

P304

631-641

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/JEP.12690

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Bjørn Hofmann

P577

2016-12-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28026076

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

research ethics

colorectal cancer

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

about

P2860

P2860

Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening-a systematic review.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P921

P356

P1433

P1476

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P921