Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
about
Floral reward, advertisement and attractiveness to honey bees in dioecious Salix capreaAnther appendages of Incarvillea trigger a pollen-dispensing mechanism.MEASUREMENTS OF SELECTION IN A HERMAPHRODITIC PLANT: VARIATION IN MALE AND FEMALE POLLINATION SUCCESS.Is pollen removal or seed set favoured by flower longevity in a hummingbird-pollinated Salvia species?Are pollinators the agents of selection for the extreme large size and dark color in Oncocyclus irises?Sexual differences in reproductive phenology and their consequences for the demography of Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae), a dioecious tropical shrub.Dichogamy and sexual dimorphism in floral traits in the andromonoecious Euphorbia boeticaSexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants?Pollinator recognition by a keystone tropical plant.FLORAL COLOR CHANGE IN LUPINUS ARGENTEUS (FABACEAE): WHY SHOULD PLANTS ADVERTISE THE LOCATION OF UNREWARDING FLOWERS TO POLLINATORS?EVOLUTION OF INFLORESCENCE DESIGN: THEORY AND DATA.Multiple functions of volatiles in flowers and leaves of Elsholtzia rugulosa (Lamiaceae) from southwestern ChinaTests of adaptation: functional studies of pollen removal and estimates of natural selection on anther position in wild radish.Siring success and paternal effects in heterodichogamous Acer opalus.The impact of plant and flower age on mating patternsIs there 'anther-anther interference' within a flower? Evidences from one-by-one stamen movement in an insect-pollinated plant.Effects of abiotic factors and species interactions on estimates of male plant function: a meta-analysis.Jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine coordinates metabolic networks required for anthesis and floral attractant emission in wild tobacco (Nicotiana attenuata).ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF FLOWER COLOR AND INTER-TRAIT CORRELATIONS IN AN IPOMOPSIS HYBRID ZONE.CONSEQUENCES OF FLORAL VARIATION FOR MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTION IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS SATIVUS L.RESPONSES OF FLORAL TRAITS TO SELECTION ON PRIMARY SEXUAL INVESTMENT IN SPERGULARIA MARINA: THE BATTLE BETWEEN THE SEXES.Allocation to male vs female floral function varies by currency and responds differentially to density and moisture stress.Deterministic paternity exclusion using RAPD markers.THE IMPACT OF A FLOWER-COLOR POLYMORPHISM ON MATING PATTERNS IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF WILD RADISH (RAPHANUS RAPHANISTRUM L.).THE EFFECT OF INFLORESCENCE SIZE ON MALE FITNESS: EXPERIMENTAL TESTS IN THE ANDROMONOECIOUS LILY, ZIGADENUS PANICULATUS.GAMETOPHYTIC SELECTION IN RAPHANUS RAPHANISTRUM: A TEST FOR HERITABLE VARIATION IN POLLEN COMPETITIVE ABILITY.Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces.Generous-like flowers: nectar production in two epiphytic bromeliads and a meta-analysis of removal effects.FUNCTIONAL DIOECY AND ANDROMONOECY IN SOLANUM.Multiple post-domestication origins of kabuli chickpea through allelic variation in a diversification-associated transcription factor.Gender inequality in predispersal seed predation contributes to female seed set advantage in a gynodioecious species.Selection on Polemonium brandegeei (Polemoniaceae) flowers under hummingbird pollination: in opposition, parallel, or independent of selection by hawkmoths?Testing for conflicting and nonadditive selection: floral adaptation to multiple pollinators through male and female fitness.Foliar damage to parental plants interacts to influence mating success of Ipomoea purpurea.EVOLUTION OF FLORAL TRAITS IN A HERMAPHRODITIC PLANT: FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF HERITABILITIES AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS.Collinsia sparsiflora in serpentine and nonserpentine habitats: using F2 hybrids to detect the potential role of selection in ecotypic differentiation.Yeasts in nectar of an early-blooming herb: sought by bumble bees, detrimental to plant fecundity.ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA NECTAR PRODUCTION: OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENT IN THE FIELD.COMPONENTS OF PHENOTYPIC SELECTION: POLLEN EXPORT AND FLOWER COROLLA WIDTH IN IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA.THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A REFINED METHOD FOR ESTIMATING GENE FLOW FROM ANGIOSPERM PATERNITY ANALYSIS.
P2860
Q28541672-0C80C93E-2283-45FD-A6DB-DFFEA53F311BQ30438191-B91D2EE1-4EC5-4638-AC2E-6167F776787BQ30461138-AC029EF6-F5F0-4B9C-B664-1B77A6742999Q34076793-382795DB-04B5-439A-94CB-D0B32A288E3FQ34435212-D2EF9712-5873-46D7-B508-15F4E099A1F4Q34556249-6BC213FB-E914-4FD9-8248-A1C14E2816D0Q34582874-FFD070A6-8A34-4534-8118-D107278B6494Q35021820-1AADD911-D491-4C41-84EE-3870A52723BBQ35212720-DB214FCE-473B-4776-AE55-2C6639FD27F9Q36387275-B380A653-0721-46FA-90E1-239D86ACC289Q36387911-3D84E756-23E2-4969-9608-E61E3EE509F1Q36986182-47109414-DBFE-4E4F-B397-5CF78C25E6E4Q37241105-1A032BEA-961D-4860-8D3B-5C37B8034173Q37260734-DF527446-79CC-4EF5-99DD-CF86BDDF9103Q37477253-F1208CAF-CAA2-4D2D-9D40-43388F57F78AQ37520886-43B3D164-3027-4FF6-AFC1-287D881E90BDQ38067114-0CF083AA-BD90-4E1C-928C-283FFFD7BB0DQ38303472-158D7DA3-7CD4-4538-839C-66F7E8F583CDQ38501921-B9465E91-9417-401F-B21B-A2AA844BA7B4Q38752047-6A182CFD-FE96-4AAC-BD12-96B51CC489A3Q38753058-09A6A6CB-A935-40B3-B7BB-3BD2453E6FE1Q38921852-7A53B98B-76A5-444C-97AF-5C5CF58A1B59Q39100147-7713B918-E19D-4C53-AD3E-A95CB9FED239Q39142608-6E39CBD3-1EC0-48E5-AC2A-E3D3332B9134Q39142614-2262FBFF-40F1-4572-9D04-0EF76B04B682Q39142692-38406C8E-1DE6-479D-9F28-246024882932Q39198531-A57DF6A0-B879-43D2-9AE0-0F05A73D600FQ39326420-ECEA7227-A1F0-451E-8BD3-75B1B0D39D6CQ39343144-DC39A210-AF49-42B1-99A3-078CBB74C2AEQ39554509-0D0CBA2F-4ABF-4E46-AD36-67F67903C567Q40666583-096458DF-29E8-4876-A588-3A9F24DB6862Q42007497-24A8AE8D-9BD4-4DC9-B677-903EA4FC6C28Q42017456-79E38414-6E82-40D1-9C99-DCDD1EDC5D4FQ42036269-CC8B2703-0C32-48D3-87B7-4BB7D71A5A1DQ43622396-6CF1F60C-C3A5-420E-8D30-44E76CEED8D8Q44227764-9B504E78-E44B-4FD5-91B7-6B2BC0C5CC8FQ44929397-D29FA822-AB7C-4634-ABD2-3233C47A8387Q46015441-241AD71B-4522-47FF-9BE2-86CB39D51095Q46020204-C82D4081-75DF-45D6-A435-40AC5B1BA135Q46029272-CD080893-F618-470A-B2AF-5139CF31CBC2
P2860
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
description
1986 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1986年の論文
@ja
1986年論文
@yue
1986年論文
@zh-hant
1986年論文
@zh-hk
1986年論文
@zh-mo
1986年論文
@zh-tw
1986年论文
@wuu
1986年论文
@zh
1986年论文
@zh-cn
name
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@en
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@nl
type
label
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@en
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@nl
prefLabel
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@en
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1126/SCIENCE.232.4758.1625
P407
P577
1986-06-01T00:00:00Z