about
Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol.Patient satisfaction of primary care for musculoskeletal diseases: a comparison between Neural Therapy and conventional medicine.Simultaneous bilateral hip replacement reveals superior outcome and fewer complications than two-stage procedures: a prospective study including 1819 patients and 5801 follow-ups from a total joint replacement registryBenchmarking with Spine Tango: potentials and pitfalls.Using patient management as a surrogate for patient health outcomes in diagnostic test evaluationTotal hip arthroplasty: leg length inequality impairs functional outcomes and patient satisfactionIs the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results.A pain assessment scale for population-based studies: development and validation of the pain module of the Standard Evaluation Questionnaire.Does point of care prothrombin time measurement reduce the transfusion of fresh frozen plasma in patients undergoing major surgery? The POC-OP randomized-controlled trial.Clinical validation study to measure the performance of the Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.Linking the evidence: intermediate outcomes in medical test assessments.Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis.Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus conventional ACL reconstruction: A matched study on return to work.A conceptual model of compensation/decompensation in lumbar segmental instability.ISSLS Prize Winner: Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results of an International Delphi Study.Total disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical interbody fusion: use of the Spine Tango registry to supplement the evidence from randomized control trials.Clinical validity of the nerve root sedimentation sign in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.Influence of preoperative functional status on outcome after total hip arthroplasty.Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.Dynamic posterior stabilization for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a large consecutive case series with long-term follow-up by additional postal survey.Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis.Increased intraoperative epidural pressure in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with a positive nerve root sedimentation sign.Long-term results after operatively treated Achilles tendon rupture: fibrin glue versus suture.Li S, Qi M, Yuan W, et al. The Impact of the Depression and Anxiety on Prognosis of Cervical Total Disc Replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40(5):E266-71.Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.Comparison of two different methods for physiologic dead space measurements in ventilated dogs in a clinical setting.SWISSspine: the case of a governmentally required HTA-registry for total disc arthroplasty: results of cervical disc prostheses.Internet based multicenter study for thoracolumbar injuries: a new concept and preliminary results.Letter to the Editor concerning "Relationship between sedimentation sign and morphological grade in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis" (by Laudato PA, Kulik G, Schizas C (2015) Eur Spine J; 24(10):2264-2268).Erratum to: Dynamic posterior stabilization for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a large consecutive case series with long-term follow-up by additional postal survey.Avoiding misclassification bias with the traditional Charnley classification: rationale for a fourth Charnley class BB.The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatitis C Screening for Migrants in the EU/EEA: A Systematic ReviewIs perioperative point-of-care prothrombin time testing accurate compared to the standard laboratory test?Interventions to Improve Vaccination Uptake and Cost Effectiveness of Vaccination Strategies in Newly Arrived Migrants in the EU/EEA: A Systematic ReviewLettersTarget practice: choosing target conditions for test accuracy studies that are relevant to clinical practice[Working ability after tendon interposition arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint]Randomized-controlled trials for surgical implants: are registries an alternative?[Surgical dislocation of the hip for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Technique and results]
P50
Q33340856-725C104B-B48C-498E-9367-6F78F775B72FQ33345935-4E59EA01-C2E2-46B1-AEEE-1FC9B63F54C2Q33727231-A94E8F58-91B7-4D4D-831B-F353F706FCA4Q33971710-24489FCA-DCCB-4AC6-B590-E7E4D0A678A7Q34158661-A357A5FC-798B-4742-8B99-F7493557B82BQ34299941-DA10782E-4632-4CC3-BCCC-860E5B20C278Q35073102-4FC3061C-E010-4B37-835E-D717C317002AQ36856840-82226F35-C47C-4568-BCF6-BBAFB2481816Q36913935-4DCD35AE-9126-419C-8F8C-8E29BE33BAA4Q37448482-7444F57C-0083-4A1D-AEEF-3BA9B1945193Q37837171-8668A06A-121E-423F-8A5E-ADE6D4B334B5Q37974331-9450E346-97B6-4259-BDA6-C2F29E474DD5Q38832719-CA923633-4E53-40EA-9CFE-9D1618DC7BF3Q38894307-5A0F8D96-AD77-4414-8E49-76AF2506945BQ39163436-04E63D3D-252D-4B45-8070-3443DC8A647AQ39177159-F2F2CD34-C4E7-4DDD-BF5E-585EF6C6B341Q39179276-0C4AE5D7-7AB7-43D9-BEDE-07365B321805Q39220295-281EE5CE-5AC7-43AF-9CF8-1B7195C47C01Q39341565-7916EA0B-B892-46AB-909C-1C48824BD9CEQ39655601-963F2A27-0CD0-4DB8-AE8E-045DB0848989Q39876752-ECC0FE32-6602-4B5C-8391-D0E123F14699Q39889617-562D0489-9B9A-47F7-90E7-B7A19A1F7FEAQ45635934-68D89610-C0EB-4F4C-8739-FDA15BE80D70Q47382785-932CAD44-F793-4ACE-86AD-26966DBEF37DQ47710229-95885523-C483-4FED-A4AC-1EB2F5C45975Q47999571-2AEE811B-D2EE-40F8-B632-65335A9095B3Q48335141-FF5DC41B-3059-49F6-9D8B-577ECC867BDAQ48778090-03D032B2-C965-4333-8FC6-F70B5E7B3C6DQ50110757-A0670E28-117C-43DD-877F-2033362C2B00Q50131213-B77F26ED-81FE-4CBC-970B-EB973F39A3D3Q50213781-258014DD-1530-461F-8348-0728BFADE7DBQ50786653-FAAE70A9-81A7-4470-A8E2-CC41DF7ACCACQ57307361-54284445-91AF-4695-BC4F-49FF65475819Q57591149-6CCEE52E-7C18-429A-B751-627AEC42E8B7Q58708782-DEFB4252-D3E6-4358-9136-73EF42696493Q61441064-093CF48B-24C2-4B63-866B-17FC526FDB6DQ61441069-0F1932CC-2A9E-4C96-B3AC-424A0AFD1B20Q81429824-2A58420D-C0E8-4424-8B74-FD5E6B398429Q83629708-B97DBB07-AF82-4D80-AC88-1579D49569C2Q83756278-B89EB20D-AED5-435B-9536-A8334C06589B
P50
description
hulumtues
@sq
researcher
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Lukas P Staub
@nl
Lukas P Staub
@sl
Lukas P. Staub
@en
Lukas P. Staub
@es
type
label
Lukas P Staub
@nl
Lukas P Staub
@sl
Lukas P. Staub
@en
Lukas P. Staub
@es
prefLabel
Lukas P Staub
@nl
Lukas P Staub
@sl
Lukas P. Staub
@en
Lukas P. Staub
@es
P106
P1153
8549478200
P21
P31
P496
0000-0002-2815-9107