Women's preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment.
about
Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment.Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia.Healthy birth practice #2: walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor.Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions.Women's preferences for childbirth experiences in the Republic of Ireland; a mixed methods studySelf-hypnosis for intrapartum pain management in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness.Being in a safe and thus secure place, the core of early labour: A secondary analysis in a Swedish context.The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice ExperimentsPerspectives on Promoting Hospital Primary Vaginal Birth: A Qualitative Study.Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.Eliciting preferences for key attributes of intrapartum care in the Netherlands.Midwife-led care and caseload continuity may decrease risk for cesarean birth.Commentary: Using stated preference discrete choice experiments to elicit women's preferences for aspects of maternity care.Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Latent versus Active Labor Hospital Admission for Medically Low-Risk, Term Women.A pilot exploratory investigation on pregnant women's views regarding STan fetal monitoring technology.
P2860
Q30659221-FC4F0F2A-0054-4ED7-8336-848870B98219Q33644397-758F0BB3-4546-4E3D-9FF7-68359D1D1644Q34026426-C08C1BD5-D9DB-4D44-8D70-3605DFEE2250Q34346585-3A68FBD5-CE87-465B-8CC3-1849545CD018Q34529576-92915EE6-5A3E-4898-A830-E14B699A3A8AQ35137436-9AB89348-68A9-435B-AF94-3E6FC1640C3BQ36244584-205013A2-856F-4C73-98F8-B6314E756654Q36244644-6EE014CE-C5EA-4C7B-9A3D-4FEE7AFCF69AQ36401716-0142309B-7F65-48FB-9204-DCA01423F32BQ36895187-16D42E02-9777-4116-99B7-361984F38EF8Q37722654-F2D2FCE9-9C7E-4767-8245-7E8443F379CBQ38833558-D3EA1192-BAC4-4E18-882A-0166CD0F7E6AQ39011868-DF46EF98-FDA1-4628-97EB-1FFB1A0FABB4Q39208999-288A6D6C-8751-43CD-9E1B-F6B19EE9DE6CQ44230937-298A8B6B-941B-4961-B20C-B5913A3DADF1Q45104473-DFCF2F14-EA25-4FC0-A853-0E04EED0B9B7Q46312165-E8EE5859-8E75-4797-B029-AD7DE6344508Q47121759-EE9280D1-1894-44C3-B049-335750DAE1A8
P2860
Women's preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@en
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@nl
type
label
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@en
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@nl
prefLabel
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@en
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Women's preferences for aspect ...... a discrete choice experiment.
@en
P2093
Carol Barnett
Graham S Scotland
Paul McNamee
P2860
P356
10.1111/J.1523-536X.2010.00447.X
P577
2010-12-23T00:00:00Z