Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
about
Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts.Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.Automated verbal credibility assessment of intentions: The model statement technique and predictive modeling.Drawing what lies ahead: False intentions are more abstractly depicted than true intentions
P2860
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
@en
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
@nl
type
label
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
@en
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
@nl
prefLabel
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
@en
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent
@en
P2093
Meiling Liu-Jönsson
Pär Anders Granhag
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/PCHJ.36
P577
2013-08-30T00:00:00Z