Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
about
Fortnightly review: Intracoronary stents.Intervention in coronary artery diseaseCoronary artery bypass surgery versus coronary stenting: risk-adjusted survival rates in 5,619 patientsIs there a future for minimally invasive cardiac surgery?Chronic stable angina: treatment options.Randomized controlled trials and consensus as a basis for interventions in internal medicine.The mechanisms of coronary restenosis: insights from experimental models.Drugs used in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: case presentation.Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and EvaluatiPercutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in the management of chronic stable angina: A critical appraisal.Role of stenting in coronary revascularisation.Cost-effectiveness of screening for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes and additional atherogenic risk factorsPatients' and partners' health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.The hybrid approach to coronary artery revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with percutaneous coronary intervention.Indications for percutaneous and surgical revascularisation: how far does the evidence base guide us?Contribution of modern cardiovascular treatment and risk factor changes to the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in Scotland between 1975 and 1994Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998. Joint Working Party of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London.Efficacy of coronary angioplasty for the treatment of hibernating myocardium.Coronary stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease and significant proximal LAD stenosis: results from the ERACI II studyOne year comparison of costs of coronary surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent or surgery trial.Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for patients with multivessel disease: rationale for the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study part II (ARTS II).Cost effectiveness of clinically appropriate decisions on alternative treatments for angina pectoris: prospective observational study.The additional value of patient-reported health status in predicting 1-year mortality after invasive coronary procedures: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularisation.Overview of systematic reviews on invasive treatment of stable coronary artery disease.Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents: current best available evidence.BioMatrix Biolimus A9-eluting coronary stent: a next-generation drug-eluting stent for coronary artery disease.Effective management of stable anginaCoronary artery bypass surgery in smokers.Indications for coronary revascularisation: a Dutch perspective.Pills, balloons or the knife: a review of the trials.Using simulation to estimate the cost effectiveness of improving ambulance and thrombolysis response times after myocardial infarction.Timing of bypass surgery in stable patients after acute myocardial infarctionCurrent status of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.The 100 most cited publications in cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Understanding the Outcome of Randomized Trials with Drug-Eluting Stents and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Review of a 25-Year Journey.Left main or multivessel coronary revascularization: applying both anatomy and physiology to individualize care.Three-vessel coronary disease in diabetics: personalized versus evidence-based revascularization strategy.The future of minimally invasive myocardial revascularization: a cardiologist's view.Completeness of revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention.
P2860
Q24524277-712CEBE9-5528-49C8-8AED-1F65ED8B08A0Q30542165-B67980AC-036B-4248-80E1-09C6FB026A4CQ33584436-DD6AADCC-E41C-4DFC-97B9-D0E83C2DA439Q33805114-7D06807C-8256-45EF-8906-32E19D779C29Q33815136-C0CC68C5-24DC-4882-966E-6F9872857703Q33836159-5ECAA73D-EF52-4318-97DC-86A47185108AQ33890371-3C6E9A48-1673-44DD-99D9-A04CA9715076Q34078583-EF83BB07-688F-4D26-9CCE-BF22C18886C0Q34130613-6EEB9688-93CF-49A7-AC8C-FA98A3C44AC0Q34153703-20F1B00A-2606-46B2-BF95-5F689EF83BD0Q34284988-84308ABD-6851-4294-84B5-FEB58800AF32Q34733821-4B00BF26-BD2E-4BE4-A948-4DBF508FCCF5Q34800502-C07E1893-D9FA-47E2-99AF-09DCEC954F7EQ35015571-E12347DB-9EB2-4D1D-9870-DE4174C07EDBQ35107090-1113311D-EA0C-4868-BE87-9A5C2470CFE6Q35371795-A14FA970-94F4-4AB3-B6BC-7FDF49C78E63Q35371968-B7EC4D25-BA7C-4408-8679-4AB3D16C035DQ35373426-A2EA670A-C42F-4F99-AAA9-560911FA5927Q35580809-FBFED3A8-9215-496D-8481-2FC5656A0858Q35582564-EA6030E1-EEF1-4E76-AA90-D440F1E44E40Q35582847-FDC9B886-D47A-48D4-B1C6-82DED8A980BEQ35698518-14398BCF-B89B-4187-8857-4AC0FDCB64D6Q35773247-74FEAC45-13F7-43A4-B656-5BF3D12F3156Q36434981-F5BDCFDF-3BE3-4389-A8E4-0085D7DC5727Q36639071-FF5E48FD-68C2-45C7-82B9-E6F7269F1948Q36728852-F51B8A77-3E9C-4910-8743-97B2DC9502C1Q36790769-E8412D94-449D-458A-ACC0-7201F9CA97E9Q36832195-0F09A9DC-5FB3-4A7E-B056-7C38A0B5E5C5Q36840996-25BBE4CD-FCDA-42B3-BF28-9903BDB5CF87Q36844811-164F3068-625B-4697-A325-1D5D852B0339Q36929345-BFF39FD0-403E-40E0-B5B5-FB9C9C95D0A3Q36969037-D2F62B47-7262-4CF8-A47D-2160305B4EFBQ37125540-E0243845-E53A-4072-B06D-7540D58CA948Q38013670-01888A3F-ECF4-4CF2-ABB7-13F13B4F6A24Q38248174-5255675A-967B-456F-977B-D540963FD7D2Q38558645-35A313C7-8ECC-4497-80B9-9803F4B450D9Q38667607-7BEB25DE-661D-4108-8236-B3BD7C6DA3C8Q39807899-A480CBC0-D907-4ADE-9302-7323FD845C8FQ40815302-021CACD4-223F-401C-B4DB-24BC25F3EFF9Q41114396-6CCA63E6-419C-4A24-8C70-FB3E3BA011B3
P2860
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年学术文章
@wuu
1995年学术文章
@zh-cn
1995年学术文章
@zh-hans
1995年学术文章
@zh-my
1995年学术文章
@zh-sg
1995年學術文章
@yue
1995年學術文章
@zh
1995年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@en
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@nl
type
label
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@en
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@nl
prefLabel
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@en
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@nl
P2093
P921
P1433
P1476
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.
@en
P2093
A F Rickards
A Rodriguez
J R Hampton
R A Henderson
S J Pocock
P304
P356
10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92897-9
P407
P577
1995-11-01T00:00:00Z