Assessment of the InSiGHT Interpretation Criteria for the Clinical Classification of 24 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
about
A comparison of cosegregation analysis methods for the clinical setting.Power of pedigree likelihood analysis in extended pedigrees to classify rare variants of uncertain significance in cancer risk genes.Lessons from the CAGI-4 Hopkins clinical panel challenge.Using Somatic Mutations from Tumors to Classify Variants in Mismatch Repair Genes
P2860
Assessment of the InSiGHT Interpretation Criteria for the Clinical Classification of 24 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
2016年學術文章
@zh
2016年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 4 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
@en
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 4 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
@nl
type
label
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 4 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
@en
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 4 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 4 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
@en
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 4 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Assessment of the InSiGHT Inte ...... 24 MLH1 and MSH2 Gene Variants
@en
P2093
Amanda B Spurdle
Aurélie Drouet
Cristina Mareni
Francesca Crucianelli
Greta Gorelli
InSiGHT Variant Interpretation Committee
Jukka Kantelinen
Lucia Staderini
Margherita Berardi
Mariann Kasela
P2860
P356
10.1002/HUMU.23117
P50
P577
2016-10-17T00:00:00Z