Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
about
Borrowed philosophy: bedside physicalism and the need for a sui generis metaphysic of medicine.Research report appraisal: how much understanding is enough?Therapeutic inferences for individual patients.Clinical judgement in the era of big data and predictive analytics.Rationality and the generalization of randomized controlled trial evidence.Explanation, understanding, objectivity and experience.
P2860
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@en
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@nl
type
label
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@en
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@nl
prefLabel
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@en
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.
@en
P2093
Jonathan Fuller
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/JEP.12037
P577
2013-06-01T00:00:00Z