Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
about
EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies.Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.Impact of the EARL harmonization program on automatic delineation of metabolic active tumour volumes (MATVs)All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting.Multicentre analysis of PET SUV using vendor-neutral software: the Japanese Harmonization Technology (J-Hart) study
P2860
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
2016年论文
@zh
2016年论文
@zh-cn
name
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@en
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@nl
type
label
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@en
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@nl
prefLabel
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@en
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@nl
P2093
P50
P1476
Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
@en
P2093
Cédric Desmonts
David Bourhis
David S Binns
Elske Quak
Jason Callahan
Michael S Hofman
Philippe Robin
P304
P356
10.2967/JNUMED.115.171983
P407
P577
2016-06-09T00:00:00Z