Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
about
Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.SAPHIRE (scintillator avalanche photoconductor with high resolution emitter readout) for low dose x-ray imaging: spatial resolution.Point/Counterpoint. A major advantage of digital imaging for general radiography is the potential for reduced patient dose so film/screen systems should be phased out as unnecessarily hazardous.Contrast-detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.Digital radiography using amorphous selenium: photoconductively activated switch (PAS) readout system.Comparison of different computed radiography systems: physical characterization and contrast detail analysis.A new clinical unit for digital radiography based on a thick amorphous selenium plate: physical and psychophysical characterization.A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.Effect of X-ray beam quality on determination of exposure index.An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.Indirect flat-panel detector with avalanche gain: fundamental feasibility investigation for SHARP-AMFPI (scintillator HARP active matrix flat panel imager).Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
P2860
Q34598173-8E8207B9-C6EA-413E-B423-AD9FE78137A9Q37170169-DCC1E843-AC7E-4C98-8E9D-87DFD41B6F7CQ39763679-C7AF390B-82B9-4CA3-AC4F-43FD90EE7EC6Q39763690-800EECAD-7E6C-4C4F-9538-C6AF57613A54Q39842775-D8BC5AF3-A39F-491F-B01C-5B7397E20BAEQ39924100-F35D4F75-D42E-4635-B0D8-B2263248D07DQ39999370-A7ED895D-14BE-4C4E-B3C3-E67B4A7D9275Q40034042-96E84493-BF16-4167-B007-EAFEC98A6120Q40141261-780164BC-BB12-4815-91FC-D759D25D99B7Q40334356-DAE01AF9-3107-435D-AF7C-A28E710B653FQ51248633-F83EAABF-5CD3-42EE-B4DD-671BC18E4DE1Q51326439-A5946B84-25A2-4809-A21D-458ABB42F763Q51905652-43D18237-644B-427D-81D8-60FFF2F8523F
P2860
Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@en
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@nl
type
label
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@en
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@nl
prefLabel
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@en
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Performance comparison of an a ...... standard radiation qualities.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1118/1.1843451
P407
P577
2005-02-01T00:00:00Z