A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
about
Determining rural risk for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages: A structural equation modeling approachVariance in disease risk: rural populations and genetic diversity.Validation of food store environment secondary data source and the role of neighborhood deprivation in Appalachia, Kentucky.The impact of drought on the association between food security and mental health in a nationally representative Australian sample.Availability of healthier options in traditional and nontraditional rural fast-food outlets.Obesity and related health behaviors among urban and rural children in the United States: data from the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 and 2005-2006Public directory data sources do not accurately characterize the food environment in two predominantly rural statesEngaging rural communities in genetic research: challenges and opportunities.Evaluation of Healthy2Go: A country store transformation project to improve the food environment and consumer choices in Appalachian Kentucky.THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WEIGHT PERCEPTION, GENDER, AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS AMONG RURAL ADOLESCENTSCommute times, food retail gaps, and body mass index in North Carolina counties.Associations of supermarket accessibility with obesity and fruit and vegetable consumption in the conterminous United States.A cross-sectional study of US rural adults' consumption of fruits and vegetables: do they consume at least five servings daily?Parent-child interactions and objectively measured child physical activity: a cross-sectional study.Stable genes and changing environments: body mass index across adolescence and young adulthoodHealthy-lifestyle behaviors associated with overweight and obesity in US rural childrenDisparities in obesity among rural and urban residents in a health disparate regionUpstream ecological risks for overweight and obesity among African American youth in a rural town in the Deep South, 2007Diabetes and the socioeconomic and built environment: geovisualization of disease prevalence and potential contextual associations using ring maps.Neighborhood impact on healthy food availability and pricing in food stores.Understanding barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and active living in rural communities.A qualitative examination of the role of small, rural worksites in obesity prevention.Successful long-term weight loss maintenance in a rural population.Understanding the United States and Brazil's response to obesity: institutional conversion, policy reform, and the lessons learned.State-Issued Identification Cards Reveal Patterns in Adult Weight Status.Do Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Differ By Rural Classification in Women Who Enroll in a Weight Loss Intervention?Outcomes of a weight loss intervention among rural breast cancer survivors.Diet-related chronic disease in the northeastern United States: a model-based clustering approach.Dietary patterns differ between urban and rural older, long-term survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer and are associated with body mass indexComparing Costs of Telephone vs Face-to-Face Extended-Care Programs for the Management of Obesity in Rural Settings.Qualitative study of influences on food store choice.Prevalence of obesity among adults from rural and urban areas of the United States: findings from NHANES (2005-2008)CHILE: an evidence-based preschool intervention for obesity prevention in Head Start.Understanding and addressing barriers to implementation of environmental and policy interventions to support physical activity and healthy eating in rural communities.Obesity and diabetes in New York City, 2002 and 2004Rural Oregon community perspectives: introducing community-based participatory research into a community health coalition.Reach of Effective, Nationally-Available, Low-Cost, Nonprofit Weight Loss Program in Medically Underserved Areas (MUAs).Scientific statement: Socioecological determinants of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.Meeting Recommended Levels of Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Rural AdultsFormative evaluation for a healthy corner store initiative in Pitt County, North Carolina: assessing the rural food environment, part 1
P2860
Q28071645-A98F1CF1-16A5-4934-9C23-34615F06BF67Q30249417-771A89F6-68A0-4A44-A6D5-6CDC36B19FA4Q30558742-49840B84-CB4B-426A-A106-1870894442F0Q30863816-2C0B8225-EC16-4939-A069-AE97CD84AE19Q33387957-5427FB8B-4E64-44B6-B148-891C9B2A5426Q33791593-7823AF91-C62B-47E7-B5D9-F85285755F47Q33857071-EE931DC2-9B62-4972-98D0-0275F2A1C300Q33870483-E7983C0B-A1C6-4215-B104-D0119FA0DC00Q33885126-97A69353-E282-43E2-A9E7-20B048DD7F3AQ33913704-BDE13675-5B22-41D4-BAD4-300E1EB36A9AQ34123496-07F078BA-3583-4105-B8D4-013CCD87F79CQ34221759-91CCE517-6941-4AE5-B017-331C25CD5B6FQ34226929-8B02CAAB-E947-49F0-8836-70C254B0E234Q34243264-071E9294-BA42-438E-9C10-8CBA828CDDD8Q34340434-46E7E08E-91C8-4D0A-A2FE-16C4B8FA4C71Q34343014-141ED4E1-7B3E-450F-A23D-BC7AA2779792Q34346315-10173743-8EBB-4D59-BA8A-3C20DC93360DQ34600159-2A225B3C-1B2A-4795-8CD3-97D4E49EDD6FQ34732591-90969EF4-6EC6-4A2E-96AC-80E442749840Q34763219-A59DC489-DE2E-4F26-8506-D238FA9B25B2Q34773727-8A545987-A104-450E-B808-50DD0C689F5BQ35107151-BC1430AC-00CC-47DA-AFF0-3FF5A4EC7604Q35592322-92A6F9B1-2BB5-4719-9B7F-2317CFD36EB3Q35741459-9F4187F2-DB8A-4FED-8FB0-F02AD5F6BA3EQ35790982-242B0EF3-6F73-4F9B-95C4-8660669A9B22Q35828107-20DA4A72-CFC7-400E-91D6-925DCDB46F43Q35857538-FA928FA1-ED0A-42FB-906A-CC73150F0E58Q36024977-5B5673AC-BFB6-4A3D-8AFD-51E8AB702FD7Q36045273-FE03CDE5-1623-46D0-8A0C-4AAA9D3C7C1FQ36205046-D7E9DA08-5D5C-4537-B6D0-7F3031ACFE34Q36245096-EDE5BE2A-90BB-49BD-A9C1-CE8E5CFFE5D0Q36347430-A2E3F217-0112-4E2D-8A20-72761211666CQ36567483-1726121D-EC12-45AF-9C88-9CA2B3395D26Q36599001-96CEFCD6-9DA7-40FF-B931-17E852AC08CAQ36677784-BE83F871-6326-4627-9FCF-FA0CCB598855Q36693010-BC6AD66D-6582-4418-9BFD-4FD99A332AD1Q36862002-139F1B98-D407-45CA-9C56-74D8C30E6BDCQ37022568-65B5EA54-DDBB-4B77-999E-5BEE420A4EC1Q37025908-200DC8D1-4A4A-4E39-90B4-F755C062D5F6Q37027105-FCA6619A-70D2-4FE4-A65C-451CF6E21C95
P2860
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@en
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@nl
type
label
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@en
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@nl
prefLabel
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@en
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.
@en
P2093
Anthony F Jerant
J Elizabeth Jackson
L Gary Hart
Mark P Doescher
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1748-0361.2005.TB00074.X
P577
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z