Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
about
Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.Tooth-size discrepancy: a comparison between manual and digital methods.Reliability of measurements made on scanned cast models using the 3 Shape R 700 scannerA new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models.Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?Digital 3D image of bimaxillary casts connected by a vestibular scan.Comparison of space analysis performed on plaster vs. digital dental casts applying Tanaka and Johnston's equation.Evaluation of dental morphometrics during the orthodontic treatment.A Comparison of the Accuracy of Linear Measurements Obtained from Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Images and Digital Models.Digital model as an alternative to plaster model in assessment of space analysis.Reliability of Bolton analysis evaluation in tridimensional virtual models.Three-dimensional digital models for rating dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate.Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?Digital Models as an Alternative to Plaster Casts in Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes.
P2860
Q30315816-8DC04BD3-0CCE-45D4-9CFA-8F67A2F5CA1AQ33788249-AEC16C65-0EFD-4A0C-9473-80F679D5AB83Q34976417-3DF88564-5444-4868-91B7-03AA810D31C0Q35555086-7AC811A4-7DAE-4BD6-BB66-2C44D3704DA6Q39843284-D7FFEED9-11BA-4108-978B-4A29462B72C8Q39879416-BB4F247C-C6DC-493A-956F-4E52C80E643AQ40063315-6BC6B719-C196-4D15-BB7A-7763A722ACE8Q40120659-256D5A9E-381E-4AAE-9772-3908017B38EAQ40126076-AFED5104-51D1-498C-AAA7-4BF30AABDDCDQ40197826-BDF1EAC6-F1DD-47B7-B275-68BB2A8E3EF5Q40320816-5AEF33F9-91E1-411B-B32F-6CBCC68D8CAAQ40328048-3425CEB8-89EB-490A-B1E9-4187B351A688Q40329930-423CC2F5-7BC7-44DF-BF1F-F9E408B7F9F0Q46129452-5E69687B-951E-4FAB-A65C-EEFB0B8C8705Q48504006-57235929-0C9E-4D08-A50A-66F1402E6AE5Q55690272-516AF097-D991-4B7C-B418-C7B74D203846
P2860
Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of peer assessment ...... computer-based digital models.
@en
Comparison of peer assessment rating
@nl
type
label
Comparison of peer assessment ...... computer-based digital models.
@en
Comparison of peer assessment rating
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of peer assessment ...... computer-based digital models.
@en
Comparison of peer assessment rating
@nl
P2093
P1476
Comparison of peer assessment ...... computer-based digital models.
@en
P2093
Allen R Firestone
Katherine W L Vig
Matthew Mayers
Robert Rashid
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AJODO.2004.04.035
P407
P577
2005-10-01T00:00:00Z