Estimated human health risks from exposure to recreational waters impacted by human and non-human sources of faecal contamination.
about
Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomesLA35 Poultry Fecal Marker Persistence Is Correlated with That of Indicators and Pathogens in Environmental WatersU.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the FuturePerformance of two quantitative PCR methods for microbial source tracking of human sewage and implications for microbial risk assessment in recreational watersEnterococci in the environmentBayesian Modeling of Enteric Virus Density in Wastewater Using Left-Censored Data.Data Acceptance Criteria for Standardized Human-Associated Fecal Source Identification Quantitative Real-Time PCR Methods.Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.Biotic interactions and sunlight affect persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and microbial source tracking genetic markers in the upper Mississippi river.Terrestrial sources homogenize bacterial water quality during rainfall in two urbanized watersheds in Santa Barbara, CA.Distribution of genetic marker concentrations for fecal indicator bacteria in sewage and animal feces.Integrating bacterial and viral water quality assessment to predict swimming-associated illness at a freshwater beach: a cohort studyBlautia and Prevotella sequences distinguish human and animal fecal pollution in Brazil surface waters.Distribution of human-specific bacteroidales and fecal indicator bacteria in an urban watershed impacted by sewage pollution, determined using RNA- and DNA-based quantitative PCR assaysHypothesis-driven approach for the identification of fecal pollution sources in water resources.Temporal stability of the microbial community in sewage-polluted seawater exposed to natural sunlight cycles and marine microbiota.Recreational Water and Infection: A Review of Recent FindingsGenetic markers for rapid PCR-based identification of gull, Canada goose, duck, and chicken fecal contamination in water.Diversity of the Intestinal Bacteria of Cattle Fed on Diets with Different Doses of Gelatinized Starch-Urea.Waterborne pathogens: detection methods and challenges.Occurrence of and Sequence Variation among F-Specific RNA Bacteriophage Subgroups in Feces and Wastewater of Urban and Animal OriginsDifferential decay of enterococci and Escherichia coli originating from two fecal pollution sources.Recreational water-related illness: office management and prevention.Molecular detection of Campylobacter spp. and fecal indicator bacteria during the northern migration of sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) at the central Platte RiverHuman-Associated Bacteroides spp. and Human Polyomaviruses as Microbial Source Tracking Markers in Hawaii.Analysis of the gull fecal microbial community reveals the dominance of Catellicoccus marimammalium in relation to culturable Enterococci.A System Model for Understanding the Role of Animal Feces as a Route of Contamination of Leafy Greens before Harvest.Age-related shifts in the density and distribution of genetic marker water quality indicators in cow and calf feces.Bacteriophages as indicators of faecal pollution and enteric virus removal.Differential utility of the Bacteroidales DNA and RNA markers in the tiered approach for microbial source tracking in subtropical seawater.Multi-Exposure Pathway Model to Compare Escherichia coli O157 Risks and Interventions.Faecal pollution along the southeastern coast of Florida and insight into the use of pepper mild mottle virus as an indicator.Comparison of Risk Predicted by Multiple Norovirus Dose-Response Models and Implications for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.Multiple approaches to microbial source tracking in tropical northern Australia.Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Spray Irrigation of Dairy Manure Based on an Empirical Fate and Transport Model.Animal Feces Contribute to Domestic Fecal Contamination: Evidence from E. coli Measured in Water, Hands, Food, Flies, and Soil in Bangladesh.Human enteric viruses--potential indicators for enhanced monitoring of recreational water quality.Regional Assessment of Human Fecal Contamination in Southern California Coastal DrainagesComparison of concentration methods for quantitative detection of sewage-associated viral markers in environmental waters.Source identification of bacterial and viral pathogens and their survival/fading in the process of wastewater treatment, reclamation, and environmental reuse.
P2860
Q27007364-135E01F6-4233-45EC-B5F3-862026A3DC71Q27324041-CA4203AB-496F-472C-8383-27A0BC3771CEQ28384415-7B174987-22C0-4081-BAA4-DA520837386CQ28389046-733A6D37-C5A3-4E3A-AB66-F72C20FF8397Q28391592-05329BAF-9516-41AD-89E8-B58AF20D0FCFQ30663560-EA6265F1-D368-4E52-8D7A-A5F8A95A4716Q31049609-7120CF4E-E486-4640-87E2-F29D719A9FA2Q31122596-4E8331C4-E329-48FE-950A-58889B82E788Q33743370-3A3DBFE6-3D87-4B5F-8393-8CAC6711FD2EQ33913538-6583A05F-C031-4B0F-B20E-34F51C185463Q34232893-7D9A82E1-FE3D-4694-8C6E-CEF359411FDEQ34542003-1B8E34DC-FD64-4A97-96C6-75FABA5AEDCAQ34587642-85A51AA3-59C3-4A73-94A4-D0120B845198Q34747528-00A025C4-72C1-4DDB-864C-147F08C5B401Q34887025-CC2A4D3B-F39C-42A0-923E-2310AA5EB636Q35134178-76DA4CE4-A55D-44EB-B8AA-499420C64310Q35212235-3B4FF20F-B166-4F13-9016-DB46384746C9Q35665596-25CCAE9D-455E-4A06-ABB1-A70742FFE833Q35685728-BC3309CF-E984-4038-BA9E-C3F814B35B29Q35824395-A3FD740F-FE89-4F9A-BD6D-6F610D2BC359Q35973220-376A9526-5D99-408A-AF04-AD2B3E98A6B9Q36757404-0DE570A4-949C-432D-AAB9-0404A17AD041Q36843114-4F6734BD-5B00-4730-8F25-C86A622598B0Q36911182-0FCDA404-92A3-49C4-B80D-BF86FD6E69D2Q37378714-5C2466CA-8394-4978-B686-8DDF21D51756Q37545516-C675DD44-6355-42C9-8D8D-5FAB278C4BC0Q37546903-52F54EFE-133D-459B-9BC3-CC21A87A7510Q37643228-DC67669C-A6E3-439E-8376-52B8A68ECB4CQ38372165-531324B6-1D74-475C-A8E7-A4E91BDB4D00Q38416741-159253DD-62C1-4843-B0AC-227085D64D63Q38687760-D6E1EC28-7054-43E9-822E-255EB716689AQ38809623-088F0B09-5ECC-4A2E-B7D9-43212F11F422Q38861150-CE1EE9F8-4E48-462A-A793-DFC416E111CAQ39297788-F9D41320-A015-4683-BA96-B09723102EF3Q40050931-274713A4-1597-41A5-9B38-FE93F096CB9BQ40144264-93912516-3D4C-41B5-A0BF-4176EEF59D86Q40400524-A265CDE4-4E97-4FC5-9BA1-263651A59B2FQ41589983-9648B70B-58A7-4ADF-94C8-8C96B1358484Q42118605-C530A72C-58A1-45F2-BEDF-DCDBA6B32DD6Q42182079-2C7B6A3A-EDAA-40C7-A8C8-0B711472B840
P2860
Estimated human health risks from exposure to recreational waters impacted by human and non-human sources of faecal contamination.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@en
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@nl
type
label
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@en
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@nl
prefLabel
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@en
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Estimated human health risks f ...... urces of faecal contamination.
@en
P2093
Jeffrey A Soller
Mary E Schoen
Nicholas J Ashbolt
Timothy Bartrand
P304
P356
10.1016/J.WATRES.2010.06.049
P407
P577
2010-06-25T00:00:00Z