Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome.
about
Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implicationsNRIP/DCAF6 stabilizes the androgen receptor protein by displacing DDB2 from the CUL4A-DDB1 E3 ligase complex in prostate cancer.Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.The cribriform pattern identifies a subset of acinar predominant tumors with poor prognosis in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a conceptual proposal to classify cribriform predominant tumors as a distinct histologic subtype.Automated prostate tissue referencing for cancer detection and diagnosis.Temporal changes in the pathologic assessment of prostate cancer.Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?Gleason and Fuhrman no longer make the grade.Changes in prostate cancer grading: Including a new patient-centric grading system.Detection and grading of prostate cancer using temporal enhanced ultrasound: combining deep neural networks and tissue mimicking simulations.Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.Formation of intracellular lumina in human prostate carcinoma (DU145) cells, maturation into signet cells, and the cribriform morphology of tumors.Pseudolumen size and perimeter in prostate cancer: correlation with patient outcome.Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.Gleason grading: past, present and future.The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.Cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer are associated with increased genomic instability and distinct genomic alterations.Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system.Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy.[The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].Clinical Significance of Complex Glandular Patterns in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Study in a Large Series of Cases.On cribriform prostate cancer.Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer
P2860
Q28066111-B588D105-6392-4E35-82E6-4AB18BA57954Q33591581-19D23DFF-C6BA-4FE9-824F-5876B448AA50Q34610101-01E651BF-4551-439B-87F7-6E973F5E1B00Q35219157-F4F905DC-AD6B-433F-A238-D918A62CE338Q36035875-12818031-5563-405D-A990-6FEAD1940D83Q36520474-60273EA6-6E99-48A9-A7AD-9A21B7C8D239Q38005257-93038DCA-54E2-4DA6-A7C9-26B8926FA145Q38565256-EB0E61AB-9D7D-4EAC-941A-7D9B48D91BAEQ38680873-407A870D-D5A0-4645-9102-5B7E020EC014Q38716270-1052DAC5-18D0-4F80-9247-9BAE7AA3CE63Q38732397-54ED2377-B3BE-408C-AF09-4AE4CC145098Q38779933-4EA139B0-F6BB-4A8A-91E5-78414C119F05Q38780754-80FC1EE3-F4AB-4C3C-9679-FF37B0989E3EQ38808255-2271EA03-31D8-48B6-A055-831BC6B61887Q39199397-905B3B62-5ECE-45E4-9E13-E4661B52F308Q39618922-14E1C0B4-6453-49B7-BC7E-2580087B1ACDQ39668527-57B8A3BE-DF46-4D59-B506-338EC3CC6758Q44345074-15AE1AE1-3EC6-4359-A084-66D7E14C8CACQ46393657-288C87AE-DB58-49E7-A647-B188730BC7FEQ47158122-70F80234-18C6-488A-942E-465E8BEE5DEFQ48062857-E8522C8A-F494-4CC2-BE86-FA9FAF5DC0E9Q48151896-D7327360-2D86-4E29-8CAA-1493821B7643Q48525011-93A43F36-33C4-4A34-943B-DBB899DB0302Q49630556-652D7189-4B9E-4D8D-9195-145C37A52C10Q53159761-ED0FCFD1-0E7D-49FA-B38F-A996AE8FCBE3Q53195658-40A506CB-31DC-4606-A7C4-C21D56C8E96BQ54989900-4373C30F-2A64-4171-8F71-6C7359DA120EQ55020762-951B54B1-2E99-4B56-ADC9-A93A2530A759Q58562217-4810F261-5930-4110-9D22-FC3F0D321449
P2860
Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@en
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@nl
type
label
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@en
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@nl
prefLabel
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@en
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Digital quantification of five ...... ociation with adverse outcome.
@en
P2093
Andrea M Abeyta
Francisco G La Rosa
Gregory R Kotnis
Kathleen C Torkko
Kenneth A Iczkowski
M Scott Lucia
Priya N Werahera
R Storey Wilson
Shelly Cook
Thomas M Wheeler
P2860
P304
P356
10.1309/AJCPZ7WBU9YXSJPE
P407
P577
2011-07-01T00:00:00Z