Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice.
about
A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes"Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.Adapting community based participatory research (CBPR) methods to the implementation of an asthma shared decision making intervention in ambulatory practicesEffects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after studyEvaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkitProtocol for the Osteoporosis Choice trial. A pilot randomized trial of a decision aid in primary care practiceThe challenges of implementing a telestroke network: a systematic review and case studyFeasibility evaluation of an interpersonal and social rhythm therapy group delivery model.IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparisonHow to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol.Exploring the potential implementation of a tool to enhance shared decision making (SDM) in mental health services in the United Kingdom: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users, carers and professionals.Web-based interventions for behavior change and self-management: potential, pitfalls, and progress.Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysisA qualitative study of professional and client perspectives on information flows and decision aid useFactors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review.From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument.Patchy 'coherence': using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC).One size does not fit all: evaluating an intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis.Enablers and barriers to using patient decision aids in early stage breast cancer consultations: a qualitative study of surgeons' views.A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluationSocial networks, work and network-based resources for the management of long-term conditions: a framework and study protocol for developing self-care support.Measuring organisational readiness for patient engagement (MORE): an international online Delphi consensus studyBarriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies.It could be a 'Golden Goose': a qualitative study of views in primary care on an emergency admission risk prediction tool prior to implementation.Shared Decision-Making in Oncology - A Qualitative Analysis of Healthcare Providers' Views on Current Practice.Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC studyDecision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens.REsearch into implementation STrategies to support patients of different ORigins and language background in a variety of European primary care settings (RESTORE): study protocol.Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol.Implementing a provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) intervention in Cape town, South Africa: a process evaluation using the normalisation process model.Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory.A new simple six-step model to promote recruitment to RCTs was developed and successfully implemented.Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making.Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.The challenge of transferring an implementation strategy from academia to the field: a process evaluation of local quality improvement collaboratives in Dutch primary care using the normalization process theory.Person-centred health care: a critical assessment of current and emerging research approaches.Healthcare professionals' views of the enhanced recovery after surgery programme: a qualitative investigation.Deliberate and emergent strategies for implementing person-centred care: a qualitative interview study with researchers, professionals and patients.Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis.Avoiding alert fatigue in pulmonary embolism decision support: a new method to examine 'trigger rates'.
P2860
Q26992138-F20FE3D7-54A9-4874-89A8-9F743E89E22EQ27005649-B22208B3-03CF-49D0-A7D9-0C49549CE7D2Q28384840-46340317-ED75-407D-9C14-FFAF935D7B3FQ28480437-18E9F0BC-CCC8-486C-A92A-626BA2338DCFQ28743321-B50DF74E-D35B-47D0-8952-B5076F6C7D0AQ30492459-2D88AB60-58BD-44E3-A1BD-981ABF3BECA2Q30557465-DB49F787-EEE0-452D-B6A1-9B8C2198E274Q33609668-7C7E3D6B-8D9E-4A06-9605-6BCEE9CB273FQ33667600-903A8FC7-4E1C-4098-A9E7-1A106E7CFA53Q33669504-11D1113A-5ABE-4257-AA1A-E52889CA2367Q33850866-C9643A0A-A4D6-4ED2-9FC0-A64165E0C3D9Q33855373-C8978A47-3E8C-4074-B187-1773F032A738Q34059826-32302129-9B40-4038-B8AE-56CE36D81834Q34212827-194A2492-9D67-4164-ABB2-CC7764E52C10Q34270310-1AF95DF1-4F77-4F24-8E78-70B8885DDE9DQ34272378-A00B1A6C-1141-4716-95C0-654C2E6E88C2Q34368797-41E61EB9-3DBE-4624-910A-7D8939126F8BQ34492450-8892BA65-AF88-479B-A794-BE3AC7857C49Q34643273-7698F2C0-7961-4087-A2D8-E1E2064801BDQ34788667-28C24DF3-78C0-4A33-B1D0-149BC814D8A5Q35061301-AACF9D90-AF40-455E-9D44-B955C3F1045DQ35101876-776D60E0-9B37-4446-B642-97DF4B374EC5Q35560607-6A7FC969-5169-46EF-AC13-C69E3486DCBBQ35887549-B5E73505-B419-4738-8724-635B10E8DBCAQ35953829-5BFC4941-086D-42F7-B527-72AD122B28C2Q36300278-246586C5-7B25-48AA-AACB-22CCAB82D939Q36449129-69B2CCD0-D5D5-4BF4-8216-DA23F56F00DEQ36521358-3CA4C7C3-DBEE-4B46-8BCE-BE6284F81F8AQ36797565-8A4A847F-43DF-4242-A720-AB6743DDE5C9Q37153118-B86D7D35-308B-422A-9D43-D313E0EDDBD1Q37220090-B536AA14-A853-4508-BC1D-D74075F722A5Q37301484-040CB9E3-943E-4D83-8E19-6928A9419E9BQ37332677-85B724F4-600A-41B8-94D0-FCC1C4675558Q37333165-AA724795-CCBD-4A62-B583-4A9FC68A8E1AQ38269766-07BE386A-5C1D-4C7E-A969-54BC058E08D8Q38285910-CFD80A07-040E-4DAC-A78A-FF3762090C07Q38599422-C49616F3-581F-43BE-B0C6-38E28B8306ECQ38640381-37A2BBC9-C535-4AFB-A6BE-6D113EAA5121Q38711330-6B734DAA-99F9-4E5D-B91D-82419A805215Q38963442-4BEC3BD9-B349-4263-B32B-160381F30700
P2860
Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
2008年论文
@zh
2008年论文
@zh-cn
name
Arduous implementation: does t ...... in routine clinical practice.
@en
type
label
Arduous implementation: does t ...... in routine clinical practice.
@en
prefLabel
Arduous implementation: does t ...... in routine clinical practice.
@en
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Arduous implementation: does t ...... in routine clinical practice.
@en
P2093
Adrian Edwards
France Légaré
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1748-5908-3-57
P577
2008-12-31T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1044652572