A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures.
about
Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adultsGamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adultsGamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adultsIntramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adultsDouble axis cephalocondylic fixation of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures: early results in 60 cases with the veronail systemResults of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients.Proximal femoral nail vs. dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis.Comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients.Outcomes of Geriatric Hip Fractures Treated with AFFIXUS Hip Fracture NailTreatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma3 nail - methodology and early results of a prospective consecutive monitored clinical case series.Outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nail with two integrated lag screws: A study in Asian population.Intramedullary and extramedullary fixations for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.Internal fixation treatments for intertrochanteric fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized evidence.Mechanical failures after fixation with proximal femoral nail and risk factors.Complex proximal femoral fractures in the elderly managed by reconstruction nailing - complications & outcomes: a retrospective analysisConvergence of outcomes for hip fracture fixation by nails and platesCORR Insights™: Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures.Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures.Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.Hip screw lateral migration with no cut-out or non-union implication: a case report.Load distribution between cephalic screws in a dual lag screw trochanteric nail.Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.Revision of a nonunited subtrochanteric femoral fracture around a failed intramedullary nail with the use of RIA products, BMP-7 and hydroxyapatite: a case report.Z-effect after intramedullary nailing systems for trochanteric femur fractures.Musculoskeletal function and quality of life after an unstable trochanteric fracture treated with the trochanteric gamma nail.Comparing the Intramedullary Nail and Extramedullary Fixation in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.Osteoporotic hip fractures: the burden of fixation failure.Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) Technique Using Anterolateral Approach for Treating Closed Proximal Humerus FractureProximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for trochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
P2860
Q24193652-3E55FF4B-5AEE-4289-BC7D-1190C73982F9Q24235261-7507E09D-C73D-46A9-8D31-E5B4E1F29A9BQ24241836-A2091394-21BD-4761-ABE7-E4D6DAD90796Q24244942-6869FE41-E96B-4182-81B4-C7D8EF3213EEQ33634001-024F6E02-A05E-4ACB-B102-99F16C198E54Q33970689-B93196FC-87F7-4E0C-8C5D-8A0B8B52460BQ34221917-BAA19559-CCD6-455B-BBAE-2849D097CEC0Q34321501-AD6A675D-657A-47A3-98D5-0D6A19415E63Q34798935-1B1F6E6A-1B60-4615-8A4B-B04F573B6B22Q34990597-4659AB58-C4F4-43F9-B074-214663053E1BQ35877976-7C35C39A-E9BC-4506-85DD-790F86304826Q36159039-BD3D04E7-573A-4358-BD9B-EE9DE14F7661Q36364127-D3A47A2F-AF23-4EBD-AEE1-BD211E4DEEE5Q36394494-A6292EF9-634D-4418-A52D-5330CAB2A77AQ36456813-53FDC5E2-D56E-4966-9F3A-54ED33845C06Q36649585-705B8968-ECF6-4A1F-B2A9-B383BD454977Q36649601-632E5E70-9E9B-4CE7-9C23-A02A32862872Q36649720-9F931A3B-C180-40F3-9BEB-218030BBF1CCQ38793817-C35677ED-784B-4382-9CD8-29FA9ABB54DAQ39216582-0F0D247E-78C8-4DDF-80A9-DE853980A30DQ39817516-E359E831-61BF-47F2-AEFB-D91868050A97Q41698467-CB9221DE-F60E-40F8-BC24-B120E8C4E3FAQ42682754-EC7C3562-38AF-4989-9084-B2C89B2797F1Q47267745-4F8CF523-25C9-49F4-B351-63D2C9660A1EQ48426776-4ED8BEE0-E193-41C8-AC9C-BD90E37B264EQ49180700-3D851581-EB24-4E20-9FDA-35A29C17FA14Q52944708-C3314DA3-3921-43F9-BE59-B0C24AE8A4E9Q55214736-BB380272-EEDC-4606-85A9-6ACB2D60CC0EQ56893771-46FE968E-F0DE-4D52-94A4-3D1639A7AC85Q59034547-3DD1E2F6-6FAD-41B6-9BA3-4A40A83E6250
P2860
A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
A randomised comparison of AMB ...... stable trochanteric fractures.
@en
type
label
A randomised comparison of AMB ...... stable trochanteric fractures.
@en
prefLabel
A randomised comparison of AMB ...... stable trochanteric fractures.
@en
P2093
P1476
A randomised comparison of AMB ...... stable trochanteric fractures.
@en
P2093
Koutsojannis CM
Lambiris E
Panagopoulos A
Papasimos S
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00402-005-0021-5
P577
2005-09-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1047059907