Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
about
Comparison of employer productivity metrics to lost productivity estimated by commonly used questionnairesMajor depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysisResponsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?Role of health-related quality of life measures in the routine care of people with multiple sclerosisMinimal important difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): results from patients with chronic idiopathic urticariaApproaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosusPsychometric study of the European Portuguese version of the PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module.The development and validation of a novel outcome measure to quantify mobility in the dysvascular lower extremity amputee: the amputee single item mobility measure.Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, Caregiver Competence Scale and Rewards of Caregiving Scale in a sample of Swedish family members of patients with life-threatening illness.Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaireAccess and utilisation of primary health care services comparing urban and rural areas of Riyadh Providence, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Linking the Tinnitus Questionnaire and the subjective Clinical Global Impression: which differences are clinically important?Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.Further validation of the Health Scale of Traditional Chinese Medicine (HSTCM).Health-related quality of life in young men with testicular cancer: validation of the Cancer Assessment for Young Adults (CAYA).The de morton mobility index: normative data for a clinically useful mobility instrument.Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC): examination of psychometric properties and responsiveness.Generic versus disease-specific health status measures. An example using coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure patients.Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals.Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set.The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.Testing and validating a simplified scale to measure social participation of people with disabilities in Indonesia.Validation of the French version of the World Health Organization quality of life HIV instrument.Psychometric properties of the SCOPA-AUT Brazilian Portuguese version.Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease.Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice."It's hard to tell": the challenges of scoring patients on standardised outcome measures by multidisciplinary teams: a case study of neurorehabilitation.Measurement properties of the smartphone-based B-B Score in current shoulder pathologiesDevelopment and evaluation of the PI-G: a three-scale measure based on the German translation of the PROMIS ® pain interference item bank.Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: self-efficacy for managing daily activities.Translation, adaptation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) in a Danish version.Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson diseaseThe COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.Comparing health-related quality of life of Dutch and Chinese patients with traumatic brain injury: do cultural differences play a role?Validity of korean versions of the multiple sclerosis impact scale and the multiple sclerosis international quality of life questionnaireThe Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale is the first quality of life tool developed for clinical use and validated in patients with follicular lymphoma.Assessing function and endurance in adults with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: validity of the adult myopathy assessment tool.Psychometric properties of four fear of falling rating scales in people with Parkinson's disease.Involving patients in detecting quality gaps in a fragmented healthcare system: development of a questionnaire for Patients' Experiences Across Health Care Sectors (PEACS).
P2860
Q23910412-E60E5C66-5627-489A-A871-9000781F1605Q24288801-61CAA25E-43FE-4F9A-B156-DE17FD3C85A4Q24804868-71415B80-229B-42BF-861A-A4C818A76AC2Q24805196-2D16449A-87EE-44BD-BFDA-73E450787A14Q24814479-219636F5-BDC5-4998-B66F-AE5EC16AC1B2Q27021623-D6250326-D296-40E5-8558-948F366D3104Q27303953-727EC656-9664-46DA-94A6-11C8934614D2Q27325378-C36EA00B-985E-4B7B-ABAF-A92B94985D99Q30224995-C7B8EB91-2849-439C-9907-DB3DCA2BE31EQ30351164-30AA66CE-35F0-4674-A40B-AFDBD3F5FEA9Q30354552-8057B453-3CD3-45A0-9D81-EBFFF522F686Q30378988-A050E9A4-8BE1-42BF-8DE8-AEAB85B07895Q30461151-D21D1CE4-6971-4E49-BD3A-46714F0EB9EBQ30478617-C87C2DE5-F78D-4E76-B4B2-34BD100F2BF3Q30487714-516F2BE0-2028-447B-BD0C-30C400DB0A94Q30557824-EE22C444-018C-420C-B890-DB1642F14AAEQ30567437-482C9B3D-3B78-420E-894D-2260EC9AC2ABQ30578333-28A59FB7-24FE-48B0-B8BE-F8651DA5C76BQ30628575-DA1C30A4-455B-49DB-B006-C4A45E2BF081Q30824310-D4B58060-5881-4805-A1D8-569631020586Q30983087-B86AF5D7-DDEF-480C-AA60-0833B95CCC08Q31014091-80A4A3F1-E514-4103-9F52-AA3818B8001EQ31033438-ED8569E5-47BB-4E69-AEDB-BB4395C9AAEFQ31137366-23A055BB-BF8F-481F-8552-8DBBFE30300EQ33158086-DDDE8FFB-95E5-42B3-AA1B-1D93647E1F4DQ33334964-EF681ADB-811B-4DCB-B10E-127E34F99DA5Q33365082-52AC1E2E-783A-44A7-9208-30468E8F84E9Q33378813-F8976AD3-594A-4EB8-8FC6-D922DBE3913DQ33445616-D21BDE4E-2F7A-422B-8A75-86DE319AC2C2Q33456117-3A8D0B1A-F974-4434-B24E-B4FEC232405CQ33458111-C8F46260-9262-47E5-ADE1-091387D34504Q33475910-A1CC91E9-FE49-45CB-A50C-F13CAC8AC8CEQ33516505-A68AE902-47AF-4CC4-863E-026DD7B5ECE2Q33542834-313E2A59-A203-4BFC-AEC7-7A219CBA0F62Q33564447-F55AF7B8-52EC-4BAE-86E2-0F5766CBF02FQ33594772-4686D930-BC01-4AF1-B6D6-15A49078C2AFQ33628746-26BDDD01-F1B7-487B-BF15-DDDE5FB257E1Q33634876-CB468A53-F11A-4E2A-BBB6-642DAE86DDADQ33672868-E7D88DE9-A14F-4B85-B103-D9B0F5F37D4AQ33696877-4AC77112-365D-4684-BB18-6EE8B963D55F
P2860
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年論文
@yue
1995年論文
@zh-hant
1995年論文
@zh-hk
1995年論文
@zh-mo
1995年論文
@zh-tw
1995年论文
@wuu
1995年论文
@zh
1995年论文
@zh-cn
name
Individual-patient monitoring ...... ealth status surveys adequate?
@en
type
label
Individual-patient monitoring ...... ealth status surveys adequate?
@en
prefLabel
Individual-patient monitoring ...... ealth status surveys adequate?
@en
P356
P1476
Individual-patient monitoring ...... ealth status surveys adequate?
@en
P2093
A R Tarlov
C A McHorney
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/BF01593882
P577
1995-08-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1008511694