Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
about
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2016: A Summary of the Key Clinical Trials.Optimal use of arterial grafts during current coronary artery bypass surgery.Influence of practice patterns on outcome among countries enrolled in the SYNTAX trial: 5-year results between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting†.Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed.Is delayed surgical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction useful or dangerous? New insights into an old problem.Sternal wound management after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: a significant detail.Lessons from the arterial revascularization trial.Management and Prevention of Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: A Review.Late breaking trials of 2016 in coronary artery disease: Commentary covering SCAI, ACC, TCT, EuroPCR, ESC, and AHA.A Rabbit Model for Testing Helper-Dependent Adenovirus-Mediated Gene Therapy for Vein Graft Atherosclerosis.Right for the Wrong Reasons: Implications of Data Insufficiency in Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Analysis.Total arterial revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction - feasibility and outcomes.No improvements in long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial grafts as a second conduit: a Swedish nationwide registry study.A second arterial conduit to the circumflex circulation significantly improves survival after coronary artery bypass surgery.Favourable long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in a nationwide cohort.The Impact of Age on Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Long-Term Results of a Real-World Registry.Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts.Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies Comparing Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol.Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Study of Patients in British Columbia, Canada.Survival results of postoperative coronary angiogram for treatment of perioperative myocardial ischaemia following coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-centre experience.National Trends and Geographic Variation in Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in the United States.Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting.Safety of Perioperative Aprotinin Administration During Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights From the ART (Arterial Revascularization Trial).Management of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.Untangling the bilateral versus single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting debate.Improved outcome of bilateral compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting: patient’s selection or technical skill?Revascularization for Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Current Status and Future Prospects after the EXCEL and NOBLE Trials.No-touch saphenous vein as an important conduit of choice in coronary bypass surgeryDeep sternal infections after in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting for left ventricular myocardial revascularization: predictors and influence on 20-year outcomes
P2860
Q33890811-40F83650-E635-4361-A022-54CFA79A8C19Q38679722-84D486F3-ACAB-46F0-990E-361D29189FF2Q38777054-4FB63DDD-BE38-4BED-A705-0EFE10E4B8DDQ39233254-3A76C175-9801-4A61-B354-4AB5E8D4ACE2Q40163531-3CFC788E-BC73-49DE-A2D6-57AEC87AB2B5Q42332216-7C0C0947-2944-45B9-946C-9623457BF014Q42345616-C33A29B2-4657-4E01-841A-D9EA62FEC6E9Q46000351-45B7BE96-FDF3-4D51-9769-1D627414E41CQ46724260-98618764-1FCE-4432-948E-1D04CC37F992Q47133654-E237F5E2-95D7-402F-9A53-3097B7EE8069Q47201642-A4272EE0-DC85-4E95-9E78-607082168466Q47204261-070A7FCB-CBDE-4B06-8394-3E9A9C056AADQ47247730-2B7283C7-9A8C-493D-B53B-911DCDC6C123Q47906268-B3741FC6-2867-475D-8113-8B65C7A1C074Q48694015-331040A3-6B30-45EF-88DE-25C0A76BE754Q49193532-3A765FD5-0248-48E8-A385-F74CA856232DQ49555606-31650ACE-65D0-4192-B0E7-F652963495CAQ49658378-8DC5826C-D98B-4CEC-9D97-9D588AB8DB42Q50069082-10485A38-60F5-4CCF-A012-346093B12C59Q50096154-F26E2532-FC84-4721-B6C6-0B4533EEEC0BQ50096530-9827C60F-490E-4E64-B0C8-23623222C8F8Q50164883-6B03E86A-2122-4A86-9F55-38B7C4E3AA73Q54207525-EE334D78-D699-4707-8A0B-220FD7E62D6CQ55018995-A8B7D968-702F-4FDA-A837-1B73C84723E2Q55273959-CE44E8D2-7635-438E-9995-127A247FC673Q55300073-CC3D5085-E07E-4A2B-AE46-BDEBA26AFBC6Q55324615-4372406F-1FFC-4F73-A14E-E1984E132F66Q55345255-043784E3-102A-4464-9AD3-F770FD3046F4Q55345612-16180D1E-2C8D-40F7-8609-703737B2DD7DQ58128542-6DE3F1E6-82D9-4A98-B801-604D7DE8338CQ58770884-42B99178-3C71-41DE-904C-72213EDD9F98
P2860
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
2016年學術文章
@zh
2016年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
@en
type
label
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
@en
prefLabel
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
@en
P2093
P50
P356
P1476
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.
@en
P2093
ART Investigators
Belinda Lees
David P Taggart
Marcus Flather
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJMOA1610021
P407
P577
2016-11-14T00:00:00Z