The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
about
Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances.Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractionsEfficiency of class I and class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions.The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment.Validity of two occlusal indices for determining orthodontic treatment needs of patients treated in a public university in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.Implementation of post treatment critical evaluation improved the quality of orthodontic care in postgraduate orthodontic clinic: A 10 years comparative study.Clinical instruments and methods for assessing physical oral health: A systematic review.Measuring orthodontic treatment satisfaction: questionnaire development and preliminary validation.Judging orthodontic treatment complexityPractitioner and patient perceptions of orthodontic treatment: is the patient always right?Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device.Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to postretention stability.Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity.Interpreting weightings of the peer assessment rating index and the discrepancy index across contexts on Chinese patients.Excellent versus unacceptable orthodontic results: influencing factors.Do patients benefit from orthognathic surgery? A systematic review on the effects of elective orthognathic surgery on psychosocial functioning and patient satisfaction.Statistical issues on the analysis of change in follow-up studies in dental research.
P2860
Q34400649-949C94F2-8240-4D6F-890A-064725FFB229Q34785334-1631B73F-266B-40CA-BC0A-F1B381D8A60FQ35018101-F0CBF114-9A0F-40D3-8E67-807CF45A0BF9Q37136829-4DD9583E-8AAC-442A-ABBE-5794CB694249Q37868964-9AED4170-EF78-45E5-AB4B-736FC0B5DB79Q38961507-D4F2A985-E963-4BBF-8F62-39BA9C80CF5BQ39215890-3DBABBCA-3EEC-44F9-BCDF-1F927E3778AAQ39463223-D1513EBB-42C8-4F29-96EA-FAE1BACBFDE2Q39755323-5B467BAB-0404-4F89-A00C-56806F4DDACFQ40018941-B4031DBB-739A-4DC5-B7F3-218017BA745CQ40035100-CB7324D6-2010-430A-928C-66DE7C8442E0Q43145542-AA1EC97B-FE08-4BD7-AFFA-F817164E992AQ47331436-10329850-DE50-4E74-A7F4-C657EF18D2B6Q47357427-17E77F68-1033-4FF9-AA7A-B6866AEAF6D5Q47403751-A9544436-3D38-443A-B909-EFE8D1838D6AQ47625185-ACD0AF68-8DAA-4EE4-834A-641F9A1D511FQ51899819-BE44EAEC-5726-4E6A-ADFB-2709190E48B7
P2860
The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年論文
@yue
1995年論文
@zh-hant
1995年論文
@zh-hk
1995年論文
@zh-mo
1995年論文
@zh-tw
1995年论文
@wuu
1995年论文
@zh
1995年论文
@zh-cn
name
The validation of the Peer Ass ...... rity and treatment difficulty.
@en
type
label
The validation of the Peer Ass ...... rity and treatment difficulty.
@en
prefLabel
The validation of the Peer Ass ...... rity and treatment difficulty.
@en
P2093
P1476
The validation of the Peer Ass ...... erity and treatment difficulty
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70133-8
P407
P577
1995-02-01T00:00:00Z