Quantitative evaluation of genomic instability as a possible predictor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of loss of heterozygosity and replication error.
about
Genetic alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma: An updatePrevention of hepatocellular carcinoma: potential targets, experimental models, and clinical challengesInvolvement of DNA damage response pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma.Genetic and epigenetic characteristics of human multiple hepatocellular carcinoma.Loss of runt-related transcription factor 3 expression leads hepatocellular carcinoma cells to escape apoptosis.Identification of drivers from cancer genome diversity in hepatocellular carcinoma.Deleted in liver cancer (DLC) 2 encodes a RhoGAP protein with growth suppressor function and is underexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinicopathological significance of loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in hepatocellular carcinoma in China.Tumor suppressor genes FHIT and WWOX are deleted in primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cell lines.Selective Retention of an Inactive Allele of the DKK2 Tumor Suppressor Gene in Hepatocellular CarcinomaGenomic instability of murine hepatocellular carcinomas with low and high metastatic capacities.New perspectives and strategy research biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.Human hepatocyte carcinogenesis (review).Hepatitis B virus X protein increases the Cdt1-to-geminin ratio inducing DNA re-replication and polyploidy.Low Levels of Microsatellite Instability at Simple Repeated Sequences Commonly Occur in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Loss of heterozygosity in mammary serine protease inhibitor (maspin) and p53 at chromosome 17 and 18 in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Chromosomal analysis of hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia by comparative genomic hybridization
P2860
Q28073241-832B42C6-1E6A-4A8D-AD4E-D60FDB340045Q28272678-744AEA42-DE80-4596-8CD5-DDAE0B76C7AEQ33616812-0B269100-A928-4DF1-B4B1-479D7AF1F302Q33711037-99867975-AD83-4323-BB7F-5FAE70F860C6Q33785451-15EC3162-FCBD-4E4F-9BD6-551EECD5DDDFQ33907993-456E7055-9B73-43C9-9F34-1403EED26FFFQ34171081-4A7B999B-B0D5-4027-BAD0-E763202C7455Q35010949-EEA82A14-A6B4-4717-A1BC-AF00E3483809Q35172518-0CBF86F0-E056-4A68-A835-56CA9E708413Q36023775-C0B0C297-928A-4556-9C22-DAE017424AC6Q36474291-2EEF08A8-C0BA-45A8-9402-EB5DE40FDD74Q36883798-15C1347F-D908-4FFA-8CE0-90006A75416AQ38083250-2B958412-8417-4A02-86A5-C614856301C6Q39951895-DD218DA3-691A-4FFF-871F-6FB70218804EQ41664054-B6B3C1CF-9BEF-40BD-BCB1-D5F540513D61Q54210114-F77BADA4-44F9-47AF-BF6B-3CBF2A1A269CQ58814564-EE21F5FB-F35B-41EC-8902-5D1E50907A80
P2860
Quantitative evaluation of genomic instability as a possible predictor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of loss of heterozygosity and replication error.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年学术文章
@wuu
2000年学术文章
@zh-cn
2000年学术文章
@zh-hans
2000年学术文章
@zh-my
2000年学术文章
@zh-sg
2000年學術文章
@yue
2000年學術文章
@zh
2000年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Quantitative evaluation of gen ...... ygosity and replication error.
@en
type
label
Quantitative evaluation of gen ...... ygosity and replication error.
@en
prefLabel
Quantitative evaluation of gen ...... ygosity and replication error.
@en
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Quantitative evaluation of gen ...... ygosity and replication error.
@en
P2093
Igarashi M
P304
P356
10.1053/JHEP.2000.7298
P407
P577
2000-06-01T00:00:00Z