Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.
about
Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traitsPedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populationsQuantitative genetics model as the unifying model for defining genomic relationship and inbreeding coefficientThe nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United StatesGenomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarkingWhole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection.Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies.Efficient strategies for leave-one-out cross validation for genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.Metafounders are related to F st fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluationsInternational genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattleA new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methodsEfficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation.Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrixThe importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemesComparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations.A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.Novel genomic approaches unravel genetic architecture of complex traits in appleMaintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size.Complex variation in measures of general intelligence and cognitive change.Increasing long-term response by selecting for favorable minor alleles.Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP.Imputation of missing genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing.Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrixSoftware solutions for the livestock genomics SNP array revolution.Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.Agricultural Genomics: Commercial Applications Bring Increased Basic Research Power.Estimating the effect of SNP genotype on quantitative traits from pooled DNA samples.An Upper Bound for Accuracy of Prediction Using GBLUP.Breeding Value of Primary Synthetic Wheat Genotypes for Grain YieldA simple strategy for managing many recessive disorders in a dairy cattle breeding programThe impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breedingChanges in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selectionStudy of the optimum haplotype length to build genomic relationship matrices.An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
P2860
Q21563392-DE05C372-E17C-4E21-9C9C-C0BBF653A4E6Q27313303-9C726BFB-F52D-4069-8C7F-F117C1E46D08Q27321752-CE52A660-5FBE-44A5-B895-6B3A95A9E105Q27496225-5CC37033-E611-4963-AD85-DD25A5173DC5Q30580702-6DBB2B5E-6178-4816-9F1D-D0EB5EC489C0Q31077537-3FB485A5-2553-48C9-A2EA-B4377545BB94Q33443721-0BA0BE3A-AFC0-460B-9A30-F29F3D1BF6DEQ33630379-5F548165-1AA3-48C8-BC81-196D229CFD16Q33634617-940DAB45-BFE1-49F3-981F-92DF7C58260EQ33711450-EBC9415E-9DD2-4FA5-9E23-A53C3AFAE968Q33741640-EF24CFD3-6B6E-4005-BDF1-A8146618E2E8Q33828250-4E89E20F-1343-4A29-AE22-DF6C1C713DA8Q33904620-3C241E30-1538-474E-8FFF-CAB7737B488FQ34007836-F62B4E1D-0E71-4084-85B4-9452FC112B6BQ34068685-F0A51E9E-926E-46FA-A916-EAB2CBA60F62Q34115303-F30D34E4-A964-44BC-A808-2B2B2F70081AQ34155352-A1C25C9E-0A29-434E-88DA-D784CDE65BA8Q34270824-222CD39F-57C9-44CA-90B3-38306E6A1CCDQ34436014-24405A61-A40E-474B-A5C3-97A56E497806Q34611952-E6B72829-17A5-4CFF-B775-0AB7945B5BC1Q34671570-A2E977A1-C4D2-4CDE-B16B-E215B812FA62Q34768605-2C5ED9B7-2F39-43B4-8F9B-8749D03F1219Q35006868-2626B8C0-15F7-4BF4-A36C-292C4575E95BQ35069502-970B9831-83CF-4E14-B317-82A39E811DEBQ35088741-1FA8941F-DB91-42B2-BE98-30A963D60C8BQ35145109-44A4EA68-EA0D-4144-92DB-E13F031B385BQ35221566-EA72DA63-2D96-4AE1-BE4A-D8130B2B25E2Q35238334-39F23B59-7EFC-4DAD-B5B4-50CA68327C41Q35613225-CE13C5D5-89C7-4599-AEA3-813694E41731Q35650315-4110BDBB-CACB-48ED-99A9-6954E265C653Q35833338-764859EC-F4F0-4F4C-B237-C6DB1AA838EAQ35963346-DD69D16A-1165-4157-B6B4-2AEEFDB3E8A6Q36104914-F78B14E8-4274-4019-9BEE-D5EE123C52B8Q36140510-E93C24B5-DAA8-44EA-91CD-8EC976408388Q36336846-97C449F6-C91F-4543-92AD-851507A605A6Q36416180-7870F243-F9E4-4070-B6B5-956CB44B07E1Q36596450-E93DD306-F5B7-417A-9842-B6AFB34C59CCQ37102384-1530D37F-3A91-46F0-9426-BABD2EDCDE63Q37299394-6476E047-CB88-4C29-A6A1-62850EAC3C1AQ37370236-7F3CA84E-E011-4670-AAE2-CBAFFDCFA76C
P2860
Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.
description
1997 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1997年の論文
@ja
1997年学术文章
@wuu
1997年学术文章
@zh-cn
1997年学术文章
@zh-hans
1997年学术文章
@zh-my
1997年学术文章
@zh-sg
1997年學術文章
@yue
1997年學術文章
@zh
1997年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.
@en
type
label
Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.
@en
prefLabel
Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.
@en
P2093
Nejati-Javaremi A
P304
P356
10.2527/1997.7571738X
P407
P577
1997-07-01T00:00:00Z