Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
about
Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literatureIntravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shockIntensive glucose control versus conventional glucose control for type 1 diabetes mellitusPulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseVitamin C supplementation for asthmaComparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studiesEvolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalysesDeterminants of patient recruitment in a multicenter clinical trials group: trends, seasonality and the effect of large studiesA systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literatureRespiratory rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of COPD may reduce risk for readmission and mortality -- a systematic reviewEarly nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Evidence-based intrapartum care: evidence from the Cochrane library.Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head.Does neostigmine administration produce a clinically important increase in postoperative nausea and vomiting?Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis and septic shock.Managing attribute--value clinical trials data using the ACT/DB client-server database systemFamily-based versus unrelated case-control designs for genetic associations.Rosiglitazone: can meta-analysis accurately estimate excess cardiovascular risk given the available data? Re-analysis of randomized trials using various methodologic approaches.Inconsistent Effects of Parietal α-tACS on Pseudoneglect across Two Experiments: A Failed Internal Replication.Evaluation of clinical studies of the efficacy of therapeutic apheresis.Meta-analysis reveals association between serotonin transporter gene STin2 VNTR polymorphism and schizophrenia.Effect of electrical stimulation on musculoskeletal systems; a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review.How often does an individual trial agree with its corresponding meta-analysis? A meta-epidemiologic studyAre "treatment" bare metal stents superior to "control" bare metal stents? A meta-analytic approachThe Cochrane Collaboration - how is it progressing?Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysisEvidence into practice, experimentation and quasi experimentation: are the methods up to the task?Evidence-based colloid use in the critically ill: American Thoracic Society Consensus Statement.Comparing the effects of antidepressants: consensus guidelines for evaluating quantitative reviews of antidepressant efficacy.Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome.Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations.The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Prevalence of alcohol use disorders in mainland China: a systematic review.Effect of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy or Prolonged Intubation in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interventions for orthodontically induced white spot lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Impact of small study bias on cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and value of information analyses.
P2860
Q21563436-92FDC3FF-D375-4590-90F7-74FF534509F4Q24198059-3C423D52-65AB-4C9C-A2BD-8114E0844B06Q24200376-6C7296BB-472E-4F0D-88E1-184273D29975Q24236241-9CD8DEA0-44A2-42AA-8828-0C7A7ED36998Q24241029-E7711C26-2EA8-4DA4-AE42-AFE0A5A22110Q24246570-3ADE087A-D9A1-490A-9B34-5B7A19117A45Q24282604-70E3D880-7C74-444C-B0D9-CD360F6B6A00Q24289247-A7F22451-7BC3-4A37-A2ED-E7E55A5A6C1BQ24800021-89EF1B3B-4C4E-49F9-9A87-8910FCE98E70Q24813491-D8896863-0CCC-4A8D-AB73-66141DD309EDQ24814417-760AA966-B3F7-4705-9426-2F276B4EC894Q30240058-C95E06C3-9BFA-4271-9C92-5F4C738C8122Q30240148-1DB627A4-50A9-4550-B6B1-C575BD6DE45FQ30654476-EE81C63B-94DD-4E8C-89D0-651256C0FAFBQ30670986-1BD88585-DF16-4555-AE80-9E4C27D8E418Q30801522-950C77F2-B58C-4B6E-9431-1568807ABA90Q30820719-FA162E7C-A96F-4C9C-B0B6-6AC8FEF35E3EQ32077393-7E9C9E7E-460F-49E3-A620-30628845C684Q33253242-AAC283EA-241C-4D71-B3EC-E0CA376D9CE6Q33398830-417E3997-4DDA-4695-90B4-28957805075FQ33776180-CBB4F231-CEA9-421B-9060-7B5690617B7DQ33892496-6F1D8BEC-76DC-48CE-BD06-2141E2C00EBAQ34424389-2A20261D-8D15-4EC8-8C77-015E92ACC657Q34522306-69CDD1CE-7C58-4676-B393-F126C0977494Q34570571-9A184E56-3648-4DCC-AAC5-1D3A51F16A1DQ34634429-219FDDD6-A100-4615-BD16-F8537CAA4056Q34731151-3515B48B-1D57-4BD1-B424-9EEE3AB18481Q34906653-AE35565F-9083-4943-B8A3-E47576901F8BQ35167933-376B2324-666A-430E-94F9-690CCE89CEF3Q35558153-3A8E0138-56BD-4F49-8952-EF2B9CF03247Q35962710-B1997D3B-5ED4-4336-A6D2-4074658D7CFFQ36007894-FFDBC692-5035-4884-B71E-B9465305CE0FQ37402975-C3AA8AB1-8E5F-45F7-9BB4-2D5F24901CFFQ37885577-729DAAA6-5172-4F40-8EE2-7605AB12B55DQ37924038-90C088B4-C2ED-438B-AB8A-A9FD373902A4Q38084550-8366CBD0-7BA0-4AC7-99CB-CEEDD5683751Q38354349-5CB71C10-75E4-441A-A2A9-D9F7DCCA7C68Q38823842-DBD1A722-09BC-43F4-A756-2531B79D7972Q39026014-D4247C96-AADE-4070-AC8D-D2F07A085630Q39190019-A5B26316-A1C3-45DC-847E-0F80C6D06F3A
P2860
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年論文
@yue
1996年論文
@zh-hant
1996年論文
@zh-hk
1996年論文
@zh-mo
1996年論文
@zh-tw
1996年论文
@wuu
1996年论文
@zh
1996年论文
@zh-cn
name
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
@en
type
label
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
@en
prefLabel
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
@en
P2093
P1476
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
@en
P2093
C H Schmid
J C Cappelleri
J P Ioannidis
S D de Ferranti
T C Chalmers
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.1996.03540160054033
P407
P577
1996-10-01T00:00:00Z