Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9? - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q41551668

about

One is the new six: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) patient-focused approach to Gleason grading From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.Reply: Gleason and Fuhrman no longer make the grade.Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system.ISUP Group 4 - a Homogenous Group of Prostate Cancers?Validation of the novel International Society of Urological Pathology 2014 five-tier Gleason grade grouping: biochemical recurrence rates for 3+5 disease may be overestimated.Prostate Cancer Pathology: Recent Updates and Controversies

P2860

Q28070143-E9F5FDA5-4385-4090-A314-5905B1A978C8 Q38841964-77F2592F-761A-465E-A97D-A8BAA66AD027 Q47576374-5B86690E-6633-4BA1-86B9-77AD3E67B5A7 Q48062857-4F1511E7-DA21-4419-9B0F-CDC42FDAAF73 Q48525011-C964C12D-0679-4DA2-A10A-5B346EBDE4D8 Q48565784-CCF7A030-8824-4EAD-A37E-03E8186F1380 Q48849061-A41EC713-A194-4845-95E5-F23A30818B80 Q57114415-936D02D8-1182-486E-B8DC-E5BF94746048

P2860

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q41551668

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

@en

type

label

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

@en

prefLabel

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

@en

P1433

Q41551668-B93EE1E4-2B39-417C-8B9A-30D2E80038C0

P1476

Q41551668-87F38918-D83E-4D26-9A46-DA04E8A61FD7

P2093

Q41551668-0FE01D94-FD40-4D9B-AEB6-11ABC604EEBB

Q41551668-1A598C25-5C98-44F4-8D05-B7DDE1CF6024

Q41551668-1F38854F-A725-455C-9A75-C07A8799BA97

Q41551668-2DEA8DF6-FF3F-4873-A339-6314FCE23716

Q41551668-7621593A-9F67-48B2-BBE2-1CD4163DAF6A

Q41551668-7C3DEF9E-ED0A-410C-A0FC-2A51DBA031C7

Q41551668-820C5714-3A62-415B-8304-89F6991B3C58

Q41551668-B534E0F5-A39B-410F-A814-C34A3C4CCD71

Q41551668-E3B5432C-80AC-476F-9AA4-C7323F31C4F2

P2860

Q41551668-03EE0528-1E0A-4AB3-AA51-3C8953A83A4D

Q41551668-20CDBAED-14ED-4C9C-9315-417B32AEC34A

Q41551668-3838DA36-0B5E-4C85-B46E-55D985551CCA

Q41551668-39C5F23E-DE66-41D0-A44F-A1F9795F7579

Q41551668-403B16AE-0AE7-4038-BA0E-1D6D6EAFCB94

Q41551668-6DDD81A3-C59E-45E8-BCB4-DDB48BE1BA56

Q41551668-6FB3A0E2-6DE9-4D00-8C0F-9D8942E98DD1

Q41551668-74D610FC-D7FD-4806-814F-3B4A41D7CADC

Q41551668-8525C243-9DDC-4679-B371-9C65907E0707

Q41551668-8AD9DB0F-90B2-4893-A8E5-333E639D4F6A

P304

Q41551668-7CC26CCE-7DF9-4145-AC72-14B03169BAA3

P31

Q41551668-68CFD6F8-15BA-40C9-A3AA-65A1FCA1E993

P356

Q41551668-D00A4D2D-FB22-44A1-9490-74590D7AC32C

P433

Q41551668-37A1D4A6-AF6C-4D49-9E09-30180BEB7D11

P478

Q41551668-D0E024C1-2871-4F97-8375-153976759D03

P50

Q41551668-186683E3-FD1C-4490-BC93-4B3805E80F20

Q41551668-3D97B6ED-F05C-4183-9F4E-246F25200735

P577

Q41551668-E3D32788-6F9B-4752-A110-BDCF67F6A4B2

P698

Q41551668-86D621C1-4066-4820-8BDD-EC52D67AD6F6

P356

P1433

BJU International

P1476

Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?

@en

P2093

Christopher J Sweeney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Felix Y Feng

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jim C Hu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Karen E Hoffman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Paul L Nguyen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Quoc-Dien Trinh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Toni K Choueiri

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Vinayak Muralidhar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yu-Wei Chen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort.

An update of the Gleason grading system.

Do Gleason patterns 3 and 4 prostate cancer represent separate disease states?

Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer.

Patients with Biopsy Gleason 9 and 10 Prostate Cancer Have Significantly Worse Outcomes Compared to Patients with Gleason 8 Disease.

P304

95-101

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/BJU.13239

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

118

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Brandon A Mahal

P577

2015-07-24T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

26207642

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string