Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.
about
Fixed effects modelling for provider mortality outcomes: Analysis of the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Data-baseModeling the volume-effectiveness relationship in the case of hip fracture treatment in Finland.30-Day Survival Probabilities as a Quality Indicator for Norwegian Hospitals: Data Management and AnalysisCan public health registry data improve Emergency Medical Dispatch?Use of hierarchical models to evaluate performance of cardiac surgery centres in the Italian CABG outcome studyA comparative analysis of predictive models of morbidity in intensive care unit after cardiac surgery - part I: model planning.Incorporating natural variation into IVF clinic league tables: The Expected Rank.Outcomes of Surgeries Performed in Physician Offices Compared With Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments in FloridaComparing and ranking hospitals based on outcome: results from The Netherlands Stroke SurveyIdentifying unusual performance in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units from 2000 to 2010.Using outcomes to make inferences about nursing home quality.Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians?: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.Using a hierarchical model to estimate risk-adjusted mortality for hospitals not included in the reference sample.On shrinkage and model extrapolation in the evaluation of clinical center performanceIndividualizing life expectancy estimates for older adults using the Gompertz Law of Human MortalityTemporal trends and differences in mortality at trauma centres across Ontario from 2005 to 2011: a retrospective cohort study.Application of a propensity score approach for risk adjustment in profiling multiple physician groups on asthma careTrends in racial disparities for injured patients admitted to trauma centers.Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Changes in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor excess dosing with site-specific safety feedback in the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) initIdentification of hospital outliers in bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.Survival curves to support quality improvement in hospitals with excess 30-day mortality after acute myocardial infarction, cerebral stroke and hip fracture: a before-after study.Estimating and reporting on the quality of inpatient stroke care by Veterans Health Administration Medical CentersThe Importance of Integrating Clinical Relevance and Statistical Significance in the Assessment of Quality of Care--Illustrated Using the Swedish Stroke Register.Model to predict mortality in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury.Comparing center-specific cumulative incidence functions.Evaluating hospital performance based on excess cause-specific incidencePredicting risk-adjusted mortality for trauma patients: logistic versus multilevel logistic models.Impact of Patient Characteristics on Hospital-Level Outcomes Assessment in Congenital Heart Surgery.Profiling quality of care for patients with chronic headache in three different German hospitals - a case study.Are high-quality cardiac surgeons less likely to operate on high-risk patients compared to low-quality surgeons? Evidence from New York State.Assessing the accuracy of profiling methods for identifying top providers: performance of mental health care providers.The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approachStatistical profiling of hospital performance using acute coronary syndrome mortality.National release of the nursing home quality report cards: implications of statistical methodology for risk adjustment.Analyzing center specific outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation.On the practice of ignoring center-patient interactions in evaluating hospital performance.Development and validation of a risk-adjustment tool in acute asthma.Benchmarking of surgical complications in gynaecological oncology: prospective multicentre study.Impact of Risk Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Risk-adjusted Surgical Readmission Rates.
P2860
Q30836741-F4CB8F9E-6FAB-48DE-8EC2-5A5F5E87CADAQ30987156-F2B0CFF7-36EA-45B1-8251-B58CE1AABDD0Q30992343-AF71FC19-F9AD-4AF4-A811-774B4D708BE5Q31031006-18E577F6-CDFA-484D-AF4D-875C2EFED2D1Q33289805-788755ED-8DCF-4BFC-9F7B-02F918BFBB23Q33306988-6F445539-5033-491B-8BBD-FC15A5963064Q33483107-0E3D8CD2-A7CD-4279-9AC5-31FB7803A673Q33602907-B177A9D9-5FFE-4A78-8CC9-289533519506Q33606306-62EFBA9E-DD36-4005-8071-12EF653B7E5EQ33611840-D9F75F90-4749-4B05-B42B-6AE916347549Q33648241-42AA5984-F0C8-4342-8C2A-39D625A3DFCAQ33725292-C2BA78BD-0904-4531-AB02-8E63B3BA5E60Q33725844-23ECFF5F-AEF1-4995-B2A3-D4B493D1B149Q34235355-30D07E60-C5BB-4184-BF9E-D0A3A550BCADQ34268845-B1A8B643-D01D-4918-9CC4-BABBF8CA5A6AQ34280159-32F98CA6-90AB-4240-8FD6-210D1AD53880Q34337181-5605CD6A-C549-4B8F-87A4-E0D9A5CC15E0Q34343994-2AE9C1F5-B66D-4E1A-943E-42A1676CCFD2Q34542312-01780AF3-084D-4B3A-9FA1-A1096F20223CQ34683098-67D19CA7-0556-4A88-9A32-3063A985340DQ35002064-7855FBA7-2424-4AD7-8332-6EB300645E9BQ35278051-4C02B32B-A196-4511-9A49-621E00DB9F18Q35680909-1844E2F4-D651-4950-A77C-8980DB2DE3B4Q35982189-5B086DE0-949A-4EFF-A108-070E7515A856Q35983535-7DE15DDF-5BD7-4F8A-A5AF-9DAB76DE22D7Q36075072-DFBC230A-8163-4273-842A-69972ECB8FFEQ36311241-0FCE4012-345A-4E50-AB82-3FDF8FA65651Q36374794-F44F9D65-D9F3-4499-AB2B-28D2A0D8EDC9Q36391053-412453B4-D31C-4BFA-B2C6-BDD6F571E2B5Q36488750-1A3C1483-8705-4193-A392-86D5863C0A04Q36570343-9AA6CDE7-30AE-4317-88ED-89F0B86ECBE5Q36740749-CA553557-6031-4D2C-8CF7-0F0678285CCAQ36918995-9D3B911F-4104-4A1E-AA87-83157C0EB7B0Q37073316-EB2F0842-2AE5-49F4-90F8-BE5FF37553D2Q37159728-ADC408B6-2E6F-4BF6-AAA9-AA4098804125Q37258830-73ED4695-FA42-4251-AB01-5E4C9AEE04E4Q37309069-20EE5954-9BC9-4AD8-B5D2-984AD6CC1406Q37368849-11DE2D83-1977-481D-8650-B12F034E0FD1Q39896370-AE8A0DCA-9114-4BAD-88B1-F6566F0C8641Q40223758-078DD531-A329-4394-AB58-E2A8A35E2AF5
P2860
Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.
description
1997 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1997年の論文
@ja
1997年論文
@yue
1997年論文
@zh-hant
1997年論文
@zh-hk
1997年論文
@zh-mo
1997年論文
@zh-tw
1997年论文
@wuu
1997年论文
@zh
1997年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.
@en
type
label
Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.
@en
prefLabel
Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.
@en
P2093
P1476
Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling.
@en
P2093
Muhlbaier LH
Peterson ED
P304
P356
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2645::AID-SIM696>3.0.CO;2-D
P407
P577
1997-12-01T00:00:00Z