How plausible is a subcortical account of rapid visual recognition?
about
Differential processing of natural scenes in posterior cortical atrophy and in Alzheimer's disease, as measured with a saccade choice taskPreferential attention to animals and people is independent of the amygdala.A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans.Fixations Gate Species-Specific Responses to Free Viewing of Faces in the Human and Macaque Amygdala.Models of visual categorization.The functional role of the periphery in emotional language comprehension.Impaired face detection may explain some but not all cases of developmental prosopagnosia.
P2860
Q33950623-D59061F6-E975-4268-BB83-E74A6791978CQ35150076-58227988-7A1C-4619-8983-98B1A8EB6D2CQ37169468-20A99653-393E-4A12-B7CE-81252298243AQ37616151-8BC4FBB7-A40A-4FC4-BBFC-05C374E6D2FEQ38782536-526D3E3E-BC51-4489-89D7-E9BD943EDDD1Q39405132-81C5166E-53FF-4038-BBF2-65850ABE72C2Q40955726-8EDBBF16-6BA6-4CCA-8C91-1E8DA769069F
P2860
How plausible is a subcortical account of rapid visual recognition?
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
How plausible is a subcortical account of rapid visual recognition?
@en
type
label
How plausible is a subcortical account of rapid visual recognition?
@en
prefLabel
How plausible is a subcortical account of rapid visual recognition?
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
How plausible is a subcortical account of rapid visual recognition?
@en
P2093
Maxime Cauchoix
Sébastien M Crouzet
P2860
P356
10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00039
P577
2013-02-27T00:00:00Z