Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study

Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42081186

about

Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic review Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea Efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis Efficacy and Safety of Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists for Euvolemic or Hypervolemic Hyponatremia: A Meta-Analysis Protocol for a systematic review of psychological interventions for cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment cancer survivors HELPinKids&Adults; Knowledge Synthesis of the Management of Vaccination Pain and High Levels of Needle Fear: Limitations of the Evidence and Recommendations for Future Research Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews Association between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and osteoarthritis: a systematic review Sodium oxybate for narcolepsy with cataplexy: systematic review and meta-analysis RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials Impact of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and acetaminophen on sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials Ubiquitous aspirin: a systematic review of its impact on sensorineural hearing loss.Diagnostic yield of computed tomography scan for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review.Do health care institutions value research? A mixed methods study of barriers and facilitators to methodological rigor in pediatric randomized trials.Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review.Diagnostic yield of MRI for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review.Relative efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and topical capsaicin in osteoarthritis: protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis.Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.Exercise and global well-being in community-dwelling adults with fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis Effectiveness and efficiency of primary care based case management for chronic diseases: rationale and design of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials [CRD32009100316]Continuous venovenous hemofiltration in the management of paraquat poisoning: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review.Lifestyle interventions targeting body weight changes during the menopause transition: a systematic review.A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007.Applying the risk of bias tool in a systematic review of combination long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma.Improving the adherence of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with pharmacy care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Development and validation of reporting guidelines for studies involving data linkage.Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals Controlled trials in children: quantity, methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of pediatric controlled trials published 1948-2006.Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study.Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised placebo-controlled trials.Obstetric outcomes after treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.Meta-epidemiology.

P2860

Q24186991-22318B74-E628-4374-ACCE-DDEEF991F1FD Q24187107-CD1876BF-88A8-4873-B6CF-DEC301A5F8BB Q24197510-EFD26CC1-E98C-46FA-9AAB-085212DE4888 Q24234543-58160977-559A-48CE-B9C7-C2E0D4923ABA Q24235039-57D5C461-BB2F-4FA2-BAC9-5110FE68F577 Q24632223-E2054C5F-26DA-403B-A9B0-52FE117B4AB1 Q24632762-8B23C1F4-B6D3-4080-B552-0F795A287699 Q26747663-1B3EC3E7-6C7F-4222-A395-71706986E0A7 Q26774317-1160680D-57DB-473E-A32E-4D959C751E2C Q26782173-159B84B4-5E61-406D-A78C-888875894720 Q26783200-25CA9A40-58AB-465C-B986-2069FA7B247A Q26853252-29FAC347-4FA6-4D46-978D-3B13F9E44E97 Q26865413-29432813-CC0F-4C76-A1C4-0453EA6D2DF5 Q27207060-1551BF9B-CF23-4555-A41A-6704BC867A81 Q27692649-15618E43-F87A-40D4-9CD1-41B418DA07C9 Q27860509-83AE0546-E9E7-4AAE-A15F-89467C5E7BC9 Q28651692-6FBB7067-5C69-461B-BFC7-B0B402DE6C42 Q30409029-F9E21CB8-6E32-4094-A399-53F65EB0890E Q30409335-E87D13A9-1837-4A44-8F55-565162B0BEDA Q30528569-E5D80EFC-4D5C-49ED-99AF-90A828592045 Q30580682-A024E29A-1164-4877-830E-EE44C7786171 Q30868881-B31FEC3E-26BA-4000-88CE-7643375D229B Q31133826-6D8EFE14-23B2-46F8-A0AC-2E32EEDA7080 Q31161134-28FFD0DF-914D-4545-BF75-E1FD8DC31A15 Q33560462-433B1E25-2284-4A1B-9F26-00DE172A8A80 Q33575141-576F56F7-7408-4B1E-9EAE-70B885CE2444 Q33714398-A2405801-476B-4745-B907-4EE3D4CCC5A1 Q33728984-571D2D57-70B9-45C8-BDDC-F365A554C229 Q33757803-E9091A86-5A67-4EE3-9E9D-810CE6A51E4D Q33777611-751F8315-97A4-4C1D-B59C-03EDE8792960 Q33841989-4D8503D9-1DDE-47CB-871B-6F055FA6DCB4 Q33927651-A50184FA-F879-454C-88D2-AE4D944409EA Q34040504-6530F70E-ABE1-45E0-8654-522CE1BE9133 Q34102963-F48772C9-D3DB-4388-9336-FDBD3E4D6952 Q34166213-67629CF7-BEBC-4125-B2AB-8B229D65D666 Q34236021-2049B9F7-8FBC-44C8-9F7C-B41E8DBA2FEB Q34413025-DEB5223A-7CEA-4925-AEE9-7F4BEA3D6D72 Q34443977-776CCB45-07CD-48D4-A432-8E770C92CCB3 Q34445701-C3A39224-D714-4C64-A1DF-7D390F8515AF Q34454354-8516A123-BF5D-470F-B965-46C1E91C6677

P2860

Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42081186

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年学术文章

@wuu

2009年学术文章

@zh-cn

2009年学术文章

@zh-hans

2009年学术文章

@zh-my

2009年学术文章

@zh-sg

2009年學術文章

@yue

2009年學術文章

@zh

2009年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@en

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@nl

type

label

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@en

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@nl

prefLabel

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@en

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@nl

P1433

Q42081186-21C61A02-201A-405F-B97D-70CD498629C1

P1476

Q42081186-23EB447A-B2CA-4B78-B937-D761150B8BBF

P2093

Q42081186-1DFCD485-7FCB-4FD4-894C-A3671E434250

Q42081186-3541BBCD-53C5-4B0B-8804-E935514C67BA

Q42081186-854E198D-E627-4D2E-BF6F-D6D219440116

Q42081186-96860247-053A-4EAF-9C9F-ADD1748F8F31

Q42081186-B963F239-3C39-40C7-8E7E-CF516D901EFD

Q42081186-E0D0BEE0-7FF7-4688-ACE6-843CFADB75B2

P2860

Q42081186-038E0967-76F7-4802-BF92-F4262A2B9D0B

Q42081186-08D77162-51DE-42F9-9638-4A13EA0B0E4C

Q42081186-0A8F9C45-B7B5-465D-BB13-12B027822693

Q42081186-0DA9A411-DB72-4CFC-99B6-CEE4D641B4C8

Q42081186-1CE12FCA-B575-480A-B728-2E7A8CFDAD9D

Q42081186-212199A1-63BF-4B6F-B168-CCE8F7C030D0

Q42081186-289A2279-928D-4E12-8B02-70B56CCC5273

Q42081186-31C8329B-4C1D-4E13-AE08-ADC8EC48D034

Q42081186-33CE02AA-3A4B-4695-86C8-EBEA20FE4C6C

Q42081186-3EE7B654-67AC-4BF6-9351-8EE4DF45D23D

P304

Q42081186-59FCD2E5-06A1-4FDC-BD89-3D5A737244F3

P31

Q42081186-5507EC47-C864-4F3A-96DE-4BC608499B67

P356

Q42081186-D5A1034A-CF95-47D1-87A8-92F510BAD29C

P407

Q42081186-6E79E4B1-E6D4-4411-95EE-22B2EE90C997

P478

Q42081186-D62990BB-B0D2-4686-B46E-4FC5EFE8C9A9

P50

Q42081186-34F7BB91-2D68-4050-91A4-D46BA8945745

Q42081186-E93B5A1A-5DEC-44A8-B332-D367E2122D96

P577

Q42081186-6D4C21D1-7C91-4F0E-8C12-24503CA3C8D2

P5875

Q42081186-31E22289-7B53-4B15-B41A-38250A36C623

P698

Q42081186-B0502491-BD1C-45DC-8173-01101C86DDF3

P921

Q42081186-6D5CB3FB-6718-4909-9EC7-399C1D8B44BC

P932

Q42081186-CD66E5C8-46DF-4D48-81F3-673ED1EBC844

P356

P1433

P1476

Risk of bias versus quality as ...... trials: cross sectional study

@en

P2093

Donna M Dryden

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jennifer Krebs Seida

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lisa Hartling

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nicola Hooton

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Terry P Klassen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yuanyuan Liang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses

P304

b4012

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.B4012

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P478

339

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Maria B. Ospina

P577

2009-10-19T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

38022059

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19841007

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

2764034

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string