Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.

about

SPECT V/Q for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcome.Correlation between Soluble -Klotho and Renal Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review and Meta-Analysis

P2860

Q55353518-B842532E-1931-4BC7-A248-D75241259D7E Q58787885-52B84173-6438-4D27-ACDD-413D6E8216D1

P2860

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42373529

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@en

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@nl

type

Item

label

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@en

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@nl

prefLabel

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@en

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@nl

P1476

Recommendations for reporting ...... accuracy: a systematic review.

@en

P2093

Brett Thombs

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Daniël A Korevaar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matthew D F McInnes

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mostafa Alabousi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patrick M M Bossuyt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Trevor A McGrath

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.

Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research: a systematic review.

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.

P2888

s13643-017-0590-8

P304

194

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

meta-analysis

P356

10.1186/S13643-017-0590-8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

David Moher

Becky Skidmore

Patrick Bossuyt

P577

2017-10-10T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1092156254

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

29017574

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

meta-analysis

P932

5633882

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.

about

P2860

P2860

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P921

P932