Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.

about

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42374112

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@en

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@nl

type

Item

label

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@en

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@nl

prefLabel

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@en

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@nl

P1476

Reliability, validity and resp ...... ts with foot or ankle surgery.

@en

P2093

Bertil Bouillon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Christian Lüring

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Christoph Schnurr

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Dietmar König

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Katharina Kuhlmann

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.

Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery.

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS).

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.

Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.

Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria.

P2888

s12891-017-1772-1

P304

409

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S12891-017-1772-1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Dariusch Arbab

P577

2017-10-10T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1092156115

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

29017475

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5634858

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string