about
Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial.Money matters: exploiting the data from outcomes research for quality improvement initiatives.Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology.The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristicsThe Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development.Ambulatory health service users' experience of waiting time and expenditure and factors associated with the perception of low quality of care in MexicoDo cancer patients' psychosocial outcomes and perceptions of quality of care vary across radiation oncology treatment centres?Health centres' view of the services provided by a university hospital laboratory: use of satisfaction surveys.Does a consumer training work? a follow-up survey of the PartecipaSalute training programs.Quality of medical service, patient satisfaction and loyalty with a focus on interpersonal-based medical service encounters and treatment effectiveness: a cross-sectional multicenter study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) hospitals.Client perception of service quality at the outpatient clinics of a General hospital in Lagos, NigeriaDeterminants and influencing mechanism of outpatient satisfaction: a survey on tertiary hospitals in the People's Republic of China.Patients, prisoners, or people? Women prisoners' experiences of primary care in prison: a qualitative studyCapturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the Out-of-hours Patient Questionnaire.Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care.User choice in European health systems: towards a systematic framework for analysis.Development and validation of a patient self-assessed questionnaire on satisfaction with communication of the multiple sclerosis diagnosis.Pharmaceutical lobbying under postcommunism: universal or country-specific methods of securing state drug reimbursement in Poland?Instruments to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals: a systematic review protocol.Effective communication at the point of multiple sclerosis diagnosis.Patient-centred care: making cancer treatment centres accountable.[Identification of users using cluster analysis according to degree of satisfaction with geriatric care services].Managing the transition (ManTra): a resource for persons with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and their health professionals: protocol for a mixed-methods study in Italy.What does patient feedback reveal about the NHS? A mixed methods study of comments posted to the NHS Choices online servicePatient involvement in health care will improve quality.Developing and validating a tool for assessment of pharmacist prescribers' consultations.Measuring and improving patient experience in primary care.Adult cancer patients satisfaction of nursing care: a cross-national evaluation of two Southeastern European countries.The first step in ensuring patient-centred quality of care: ask the patient.Patient satisfaction, patients leaving hospital against medical advice and mortality in Italian university hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis.Adherence to professional guidelines for patients with urinary incontinence by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.Use of Rasch analysis to refine a patient-reported questionnaire on satisfaction with communication of the multiple sclerosis diagnosisThe Hedonic Procedural Effect of Traditional Medicines
P2860
Q33347572-DE8618DE-EC22-4167-9A35-4500A6D7D956Q33419176-4CA2A79E-6B22-41ED-934C-7A95669B803AQ33431007-3B52E8A2-BBA3-48BC-BE71-71FECA65E6DFQ33495749-14BE10E3-79B9-40AA-9FD1-741C3AD42477Q33549958-12D87171-8B8D-42A5-9FDE-DB2E69346D74Q33614287-15988C00-B614-4262-8363-66C6FA1FB06EQ36101287-16AD0FE9-B47D-48EE-B4C4-D31E94157F20Q36230376-12E69138-1C36-45AC-B260-54743CB265B6Q36298734-47AB3282-7B48-4550-A215-D9974D899364Q36325909-28D88294-053C-4C50-99DC-EA600349B181Q36498840-961838CB-0E15-4997-A049-D1EA4D23156EQ36833941-EFE5C8A9-2246-4AF6-9A26-7D82CF20492FQ36862240-11CAED82-F86A-4F5A-8C2B-DB09F6B6F28BQ37121839-FB7581CA-40B4-4772-89E8-BCDDE768BD63Q37332961-C459F1DF-7B7A-4BE7-A438-5FB24838B97AQ37424617-849EA84F-2C5E-4B0A-BB50-FD77BDCDED9AQ37590417-C0D0020E-E526-4838-9C21-2D1E8F6EC126Q37784932-3CE0A361-3000-4983-96C0-CB71A466EB2AQ37912288-FC792EF5-7CB0-4D47-97BF-E286AE76375FQ38175445-C5BFA9EF-9445-4F81-BD6A-DBA73C11F451Q38185788-C3F67D48-1140-4AEC-A6F6-437830A23764Q38201667-6D309C30-182A-44E2-ACB1-3AA8F788628BQ38407535-A97F5288-DD4B-4AC5-BE6B-68F397D3CC32Q40071350-CDB429F7-463E-496E-8CF8-6B7DFF6678FCQ41485030-C5C19C92-83C4-493D-B1B9-9693B3D1834CQ42337538-AF3CA647-72F3-473E-B200-42F15BFB6A93Q44123107-01A97F28-FF4E-4F1D-9DD4-3463A66131BCQ46104074-D80C9CA2-9556-4E00-B6EB-6C1A28F240A6Q46461166-2F7D0781-2748-4146-ACBC-410F891CD7BDQ47918919-58321568-4B7E-4F22-91F2-541EDA3FC110Q48148643-23867C2B-215C-4AB5-BB9E-3774EA377E7EQ48344931-1DAA139A-BA2A-41AD-AA00-D985CE5D126BQ56973532-3B0D5CB5-4FE8-48BD-BA53-D2789BC82D03Q57427002-90F2C091-977F-4124-8C83-BD155239AC42
P2860
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
2006年论文
@zh
2006年论文
@zh-cn
name
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@en
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@nl
type
label
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@en
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@nl
prefLabel
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@en
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Can patients assess the quality of health care?
@en
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.333.7557.1
P407
P577
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z